We previously used the hash file from https://dl.biocommons.org/uta/ like https://dl.biocommons.org/uta/uta_20210129b.pgd.gz.sha512 as an integrity check in a pipeline used to update our version of UTA db.
Seems like the admin code https://github.com/biocommons/uta/blob/ca7c9e80610984482d4ae8b39692ee15e4daaee3/loading/admin.mk#L49C1-L49C104 still supports publishing the additional files with each UTA release including the hash. Was there an explicit reason we didn't publish that for uta_20241220? I didn't see any issues indicating a change here. If not, would it be possible to add back the hashes for the releases after 2021.
We previously used the hash file from https://dl.biocommons.org/uta/ like https://dl.biocommons.org/uta/uta_20210129b.pgd.gz.sha512 as an integrity check in a pipeline used to update our version of UTA db.
Seems like the admin code https://github.com/biocommons/uta/blob/ca7c9e80610984482d4ae8b39692ee15e4daaee3/loading/admin.mk#L49C1-L49C104 still supports publishing the additional files with each UTA release including the hash. Was there an explicit reason we didn't publish that for uta_20241220? I didn't see any issues indicating a change here. If not, would it be possible to add back the hashes for the releases after 2021.