Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
MANE transcript status is useful for selection/prioritization of UTA query results. It'd be nice to build this directly into UTA so we don't have to acquire/incorporate that data separately
Describe the solution you'd like
ikd, something like
- adding a column indicating MANE status (e.g.,
mane_select, mane_plus_clinical) to relevant tables or views such as transcript or tx_def_summary_v or
- providing a separate joinable table keyed by
tx_ac
Describe alternatives you've considered
I think you could argue that this is a little beyond the scope of UTA, and that users should be joining results against their own copies of MANE annotation releases from ensembl/ncbi/both, which would be reasonable -- I think this is an increasingly common workflow, though, so it'd be nice if we could capture it jointly
Additional context
n/a
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
MANE transcript status is useful for selection/prioritization of UTA query results. It'd be nice to build this directly into UTA so we don't have to acquire/incorporate that data separately
Describe the solution you'd like
ikd, something like
mane_select,mane_plus_clinical) to relevant tables or views such astranscriptortx_def_summary_vortx_acDescribe alternatives you've considered
I think you could argue that this is a little beyond the scope of UTA, and that users should be joining results against their own copies of MANE annotation releases from ensembl/ncbi/both, which would be reasonable -- I think this is an increasingly common workflow, though, so it'd be nice if we could capture it jointly
Additional context
n/a