The defect. Features stored at H3 res-8 (ACE ranks, plant/endemic richness, freshwater richness) or res-9 (connectivity) must be overlaid against a conserved-areas layer stored at res-10. Coarsening the conserved layer with MAX over the ~49 res-10 children of each res-8 cell inflates the result ~1.5x. The correct reducer is an area-weighted mean.
MAX is right when combining overlapping conservation units within a single cell, and wrong when coarsening across child cells. Same keyword, two operations — which is why models get it wrong.
Verified 2026-08-02, ACE statewide BioRank rank-5 (BioRankSW=5):
| reducer |
result |
MAX over the 49 res-10 children |
32.56% |
area-weighted mean (SUM/49) |
21.04% |
| 2025 Assessment |
21.09% |
WITH cons10 AS (
SELECT h10, LEAST(SUM((Final_g1_p+Final_g2_p)/100.0),1) AS w12
FROM read_parquet('s3://public-ca30x30/conserved-areas-terrestrial-2025/hex/h0=*/data_0.parquet')
GROUP BY h10),
cons8 AS (
SELECT h3_cell_to_parent(h10,8) AS h8,
MAX(w12) AS w12_max, -- wrong when coarsening
SUM(w12)/49.0 AS w12_areawt -- correct
FROM cons10 GROUP BY 1),
feat AS (
SELECT DISTINCT h8
FROM read_parquet('s3://public-cdfw/ace/terrestrial-biodiversity-summary/hex/h0=*/data_0.parquet')
WHERE BioRankSW = 5)
SELECT ROUND(100*AVG(COALESCE(c.w12_max,0)),2) AS pct_using_MAX_rollup,
ROUND(100*AVG(COALESCE(c.w12_areawt,0)),2) AS pct_using_area_weighted_mean
FROM feat f LEFT JOIN cons8 c USING (h8);
-- 32.56 | 21.04
An equivalent correct approach avoids coarsening entirely: filter the res-10 conserved layer to the feature's h8 set and sum at res-10.
Impact on shipping models, 2 trials each — 32.7 is exactly the MAX artifact:
| model |
t1 |
t2 |
glm-5.2 |
21.2 |
21.2 |
kimi-k3 |
21.2 |
32.7 |
claude-sonnet-5 |
wrong method, no % |
32.7 |
res-10 fractional features (CWHR habitats) are unaffected — 9/9 exact across all three models.
Fix belongs upstream, in the MCP tool's H3 guidance, not in this app's system prompt: boettiger-lab/mcp-data-server#312. Do not work around it here.
Done when: the guidance lands and a headless matrix (ACE BioRankSW rank-5, 3 trials x 3 shipping models) returns 21.x in every cell.
The defect. Features stored at H3 res-8 (ACE ranks, plant/endemic richness, freshwater richness) or res-9 (connectivity) must be overlaid against a conserved-areas layer stored at res-10. Coarsening the conserved layer with
MAXover the ~49 res-10 children of each res-8 cell inflates the result ~1.5x. The correct reducer is an area-weighted mean.MAXis right when combining overlapping conservation units within a single cell, and wrong when coarsening across child cells. Same keyword, two operations — which is why models get it wrong.Verified 2026-08-02, ACE statewide BioRank rank-5 (
BioRankSW=5):MAXover the 49 res-10 childrenSUM/49)An equivalent correct approach avoids coarsening entirely: filter the res-10 conserved layer to the feature's
h8set and sum at res-10.Impact on shipping models, 2 trials each —
32.7is exactly theMAXartifact:glm-5.2kimi-k3claude-sonnet-5res-10 fractional features (CWHR habitats) are unaffected — 9/9 exact across all three models.
Fix belongs upstream, in the MCP tool's H3 guidance, not in this app's system prompt: boettiger-lab/mcp-data-server#312. Do not work around it here.
Done when: the guidance lands and a headless matrix (ACE BioRankSW rank-5, 3 trials x 3 shipping models) returns 21.x in every cell.