-
Will (I'm only about 56% that I am asking the question correctly, so please feel free to rephrase the question more accurately) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
I think the summary of the current status quo is:
bootc isn't going to explicitly not support IMA to be clear - mechanically it appears as another extended attribute and we don't need to care about it. But composefs has much stronger security properties. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I think the summary of the current status quo is:
security.ima
set via e.g.podman build
is supported in theory since containers/storage#657 there were a variety of followups and I'm not sure about testing of that (also ref containers/storage#1608 )bootc isn't going to explicitly not support IMA to be clear - mechanically it appears as another extended attribute and we don't need to care about it. But composefs has much stronger securit…