You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: json-schema-autogen/bke_taxonomy.json
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -2409,7 +2409,7 @@
2409
2409
},
2410
2410
"GeneAnnotation": {
2411
2411
"additionalProperties": false,
2412
-
"description": "An annotation describing the location, boundaries, and functions of individual genes within a genome annotation.",
2412
+
"description": "Represents a single gene. Includes metadata about the gene, such as its molecular type and the genome annotation it was referenced from.",
2413
2413
"properties": {
2414
2414
"category": {
2415
2415
"description": "Name of the high level ontology class in which this entity is categorized. Corresponds to the label for the biolink entity type class. In a neo4j database this MAY correspond to the neo4j label tag. In an RDF database it should be a biolink model class URI. This field is multi-valued. It should include values for ancestors of the biolink class; for example, a protein such as Shh would have category values `biolink:Protein`, `biolink:GeneProduct`, `biolink:MolecularEntity`. In an RDF database, nodes will typically have an rdf:type triples. This can be to the most specific biolink class, or potentially to a class more specific than something in biolink. For example, a sequence feature `f` may have a rdf:type assertion to a SO class such as TF_binding_site, which is more specific than anything in biolink. Here we would have categories {biolink:GenomicEntity, biolink:MolecularEntity, biolink:NamedThing}. NOTE: The category slot was modified to have a curie range and a pattern for bican categories.",
@@ -2531,7 +2531,7 @@
2531
2531
"type": "string"
2532
2532
}
2533
2533
],
2534
-
"description": "The genome annotation that this gene annotation was referenced from.",
2534
+
"description": "The genome annotation that this gene was referenced from.",
2535
2535
"type": "string"
2536
2536
},
2537
2537
"source_id": {
@@ -2724,7 +2724,7 @@
2724
2724
},
2725
2725
"GenomeAnnotation": {
2726
2726
"additionalProperties": false,
2727
-
"description": "Location and nomenclature of genes and all of the coding regions in a genome assembly and the classification of genes and transcripts into types.",
2727
+
"description": "Represents a genome annotation. Includes metadata about the genome, such as its version and reference assembly.",
2728
2728
"properties": {
2729
2729
"authority": {
2730
2730
"$ref": "#/$defs/AuthorityType",
@@ -2911,7 +2911,7 @@
2911
2911
},
2912
2912
"GenomeAssembly": {
2913
2913
"additionalProperties": false,
2914
-
"description": "Genome assembly to contain version and label information",
2914
+
"description": "Represents a genome assembly. A genome assembly is a computational representation of a genome sequence.",
2915
2915
"properties": {
2916
2916
"category": {
2917
2917
"description": "Name of the high level ontology class in which this entity is categorized. Corresponds to the label for the biolink entity type class. In a neo4j database this MAY correspond to the neo4j label tag. In an RDF database it should be a biolink model class URI. This field is multi-valued. It should include values for ancestors of the biolink class; for example, a protein such as Shh would have category values `biolink:Protein`, `biolink:GeneProduct`, `biolink:MolecularEntity`. In an RDF database, nodes will typically have an rdf:type triples. This can be to the most specific biolink class, or potentially to a class more specific than something in biolink. For example, a sequence feature `f` may have a rdf:type assertion to a SO class such as TF_binding_site, which is more specific than anything in biolink. Here we would have categories {biolink:GenomicEntity, biolink:MolecularEntity, biolink:NamedThing}. NOTE: The category slot was modified to have a curie range and a pattern for bican categories.",
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: json-schema-autogen/genome_annotation.json
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@
683
683
},
684
684
"GeneAnnotation": {
685
685
"additionalProperties": false,
686
-
"description": "An annotation describing the location, boundaries, and functions of individual genes within a genome annotation.",
686
+
"description": "Represents a single gene. Includes metadata about the gene, such as its molecular type and the genome annotation it was referenced from.",
687
687
"properties": {
688
688
"category": {
689
689
"description": "Name of the high level ontology class in which this entity is categorized. Corresponds to the label for the biolink entity type class. In a neo4j database this MAY correspond to the neo4j label tag. In an RDF database it should be a biolink model class URI. This field is multi-valued. It should include values for ancestors of the biolink class; for example, a protein such as Shh would have category values `biolink:Protein`, `biolink:GeneProduct`, `biolink:MolecularEntity`. In an RDF database, nodes will typically have an rdf:type triples. This can be to the most specific biolink class, or potentially to a class more specific than something in biolink. For example, a sequence feature `f` may have a rdf:type assertion to a SO class such as TF_binding_site, which is more specific than anything in biolink. Here we would have categories {biolink:GenomicEntity, biolink:MolecularEntity, biolink:NamedThing}. NOTE: The category slot was modified to have a curie range and a pattern for bican categories.",
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@
805
805
"type": "string"
806
806
}
807
807
],
808
-
"description": "The genome annotation that this gene annotation was referenced from.",
808
+
"description": "The genome annotation that this gene was referenced from.",
809
809
"type": "string"
810
810
},
811
811
"source_id": {
@@ -998,7 +998,7 @@
998
998
},
999
999
"GenomeAnnotation": {
1000
1000
"additionalProperties": false,
1001
-
"description": "Location and nomenclature of genes and all of the coding regions in a genome assembly and the classification of genes and transcripts into types.",
1001
+
"description": "Represents a genome annotation. Includes metadata about the genome, such as its version and reference assembly.",
1002
1002
"properties": {
1003
1003
"authority": {
1004
1004
"$ref": "#/$defs/AuthorityType",
@@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@
1185
1185
},
1186
1186
"GenomeAssembly": {
1187
1187
"additionalProperties": false,
1188
-
"description": "Genome assembly to contain version and label information",
1188
+
"description": "Represents a genome assembly. A genome assembly is a computational representation of a genome sequence.",
1189
1189
"properties": {
1190
1190
"category": {
1191
1191
"description": "Name of the high level ontology class in which this entity is categorized. Corresponds to the label for the biolink entity type class. In a neo4j database this MAY correspond to the neo4j label tag. In an RDF database it should be a biolink model class URI. This field is multi-valued. It should include values for ancestors of the biolink class; for example, a protein such as Shh would have category values `biolink:Protein`, `biolink:GeneProduct`, `biolink:MolecularEntity`. In an RDF database, nodes will typically have an rdf:type triples. This can be to the most specific biolink class, or potentially to a class more specific than something in biolink. For example, a sequence feature `f` may have a rdf:type assertion to a SO class such as TF_binding_site, which is more specific than anything in biolink. Here we would have categories {biolink:GenomicEntity, biolink:MolecularEntity, biolink:NamedThing}. NOTE: The category slot was modified to have a curie range and a pattern for bican categories.",
Abbreviationdenotes_gene_annotationgene annotationTRUEFALSEOne of potentially many gene annotation terms to which the abbreviation denotes.Some abbreviation (a) denotes some GeneAnnotation (G) if and only if a refers to G.denotesallen
4
+
Abbreviationdenotes_gene_annotationGeneAnnotationTRUEFALSEOne of potentially many gene annotation terms to which the abbreviation denotes.Some abbreviation (a) denotes some GeneAnnotation (G) if and only if a refers to G.denotesallen
5
5
Abbreviationdenotes_parcellation_termParcellationTermTRUEFALSEOne of potentially many parcellation terms (anatomical structures) which the abbreviation denotes.A denotes some PTdenotesallen
6
6
CellTypeSetpart_of_taxonomyCellTypeTaxonomyFALSETRUEThe cell types taxonomy for which the cell type set is part of.CTS part_of_taxonomy CTT if and only if CTT is a taxonomy, and CTS is a member of CTT
7
7
CellTypeSetcontains_taxonCellTypeTaxonTRUEFALSEOne of potentially many cell types taxons which together defines the cell type set.CTS contains_taxon CTT if and only if CTT is a part of CTS
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ DisplayColor is_color_for_taxon CellTypeTaxon FALSE TRUE The associated cell typ
28
28
DisplayColoris_color_for_setCellTypeSetFALSETRUEThe associated cell type set of the specified display color.DC is_color_for CTS if DC is associated with CTSis_color_forallen
29
29
ObservationMatrixwas_generated_byObservationMatrixCreationProcessFALSETRUEThe aggregation process from which a observation matrix was generated by.OM was_generated_by some OMCP if and only if OMCP is a process and OM was_output_of OMCP
30
30
ObservationMatrixrepresented_byMatrixFileTRUEFALSEOne of potentially matrix files which together represents the entire observation matrix.MF concretizes some OM
31
-
ObservationMatrixhas_variablegene annotationTRUEFALSEOne of set of genes which together forms the variable set of an observation matrix.
31
+
ObservationMatrixhas_variableGeneAnnotationTRUEFALSEOne of set of genes which together forms the variable set of an observation matrix.
32
32
ObservationMatrixwas_derived_fromCellSpecimenTRUEFALSEOne of many cell specimens from which observations in the matrix was derived from.OM was_derived_from some CSp if and only if OM has_input some CSp
33
33
ObservationRowpart_of_matrixObservationMatrixFALSETRUEThe observation matrix for which is observation row is part of.OR part_of_matrix some OM if and only if OR part_of some OM
34
34
ObservationRowrepresented_inMatrixFileFALSETRUEThe specific file where this observation row is represented.OR represented in MF if and only if OR is part_of some OM and OM is_concretized_in some MF
0 commit comments