Maintained repo or alternative

[whysthatso]

if anybody reads this, is there a maintained fork of runbook anywhere out there?

or does anybody have an alternative?

[doolin]

I'm really interested in both an alternative and using a maintained fork.

[dbohdan]

Check out joerdav/xc#116 for a discussion of alternatives.

[whysthatso]

this is a good selection, albeit personally i would like to stick to a ruby-based program. so it's still on the todo list to get an updated version of this going. or in my interest, rather.

[doolin]

@whysthatso I've got a fork with all specs passing. I'm going to maintain my own fork and bring it up date over the summer.

[whysthatso]

@whysthatso I've got a fork with all specs passing. I'm going to maintain my own fork and bring it up date over the summer.

@doolin any update on that?

[doolin]

@whysthatso I've got a fork with all specs passing. I'm going to maintain my own fork and bring it up date over the summer.

@doolin any update on that?

I added a bunch of specs (709 passing, 2 pending) to improve coverage and fixed a couple of bugs related to dependency updates. I'm currently keeping Ruby and the Gemfile up to date: https://github.com/doolin/runbook/commits/master/. Commits tend to be small and atomic.

I'll keep it up to date, and probably see if I can get it up to full line and branch spec coverage if I get bored.

It's partially linted as well. I might lint the whole at thing at some point.

The next major piece of work it needs is separating out the Docker integration into a plugin.

Would be nice if the gem maintainers pulled the whole fork in. It should apply cleanly, I've been fastidious with the commits.

Enjoy!