Support for well-known types like google.type.Decimal and google.type.Money

[jschaf]

What's your stance on adding validation for well-known types? I'd like to add support for the following types:

• google.type.Money.
• google.protobuf.Timestamp
• google.type.PostalAddress
• google.type.Decimal

Alternately, is there a mechanism for adding validation on the fields of an external message?

[rodaine]

Many of the WKTs are covered (including google.protobuf.Timestamp), but I'm hesitant to suggest adding support for these other types as it's another dependency. The google.protobuf.* WKTs are almost always bundled and special-cased by generator plugins and runtime libs, but the google.type.* ones are not.

Alternately, is there a mechanism for adding validation on the fields of an external message?

Currently there is not, but it might be worth exploring side-loading validations for external types.

[jschaf]

Ah, so WKT refers exclusively to google.protobuf.*.

Feel free to close or repurpose for side-loading validations.

[LionH]

We're also interested in side-loading validations. We're currently using additional types not covered by this project like:

• google.type.TimeOfDay
• google.type.DayOfWeek
• google.type.Date

[glerchundi]

We also wanted to side load validation as well. Currently we’re wrapping the Validate with another custom one.

do you have something in mind @rodaine? I was thinking on some kind of plugin system executed on build time.

[daemonl]

I'm casually working on a simple plugin system, having some troubles with an existing issue in imports, but the general gist is there EmbedFi#7

[jschaf]

Does completed mean this is implemented or that it's out of scope?

[loeffel-io]

+1

[DustinJSilk]

@daemonl i dont think i fully follow EmbedFi#7, would you be able to share an example validating a well known type like a Date, Money, or just another complete pseudo example?

Thanks!

[daemonl]

It's been a while, but we are using it in this project: https://github.com/EmbedFi/protoc-gen-validate-embedfi