|
| 1 | +"use strict"; |
| 2 | +Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true }); |
| 3 | +exports.assert = void 0; |
| 4 | +const ai_1 = require("ai"); |
| 5 | +const zod_1 = require("zod"); |
| 6 | +const config_1 = require("./config"); |
| 7 | +const constants_1 = require("./constants"); |
| 8 | +const logger_1 = require("./logger"); |
| 9 | +const models_1 = require("./models"); |
| 10 | +const utils_1 = require("./utils"); |
| 11 | +const assertionSchema = zod_1.z.object({ |
| 12 | + assertionPassed: zod_1.z.boolean().describe("Indicates whether the assertion passed or not."), |
| 13 | + confidenceScore: zod_1.z |
| 14 | + .number() |
| 15 | + .describe("Confidence score of the assertion, between 0 and 100."), |
| 16 | + reasoning: zod_1.z |
| 17 | + .string() |
| 18 | + .describe("Brief explanation of the reasoning behind your decision - explain why the assertion passed or failed."), |
| 19 | +}); |
| 20 | +/** |
| 21 | + * Multi-model consensus assertion engine. |
| 22 | + * Runs Claude and Gemini in parallel; if they disagree, a third model (arbiter) makes the final call. |
| 23 | + * An assertion passes only if both models agree (or the arbiter decides). |
| 24 | + * Automatically retries failed assertions once with a fresh page snapshot. |
| 25 | + * |
| 26 | + * @param options - Assertion configuration |
| 27 | + * @param options.page - The Playwright page instance to take snapshots from |
| 28 | + * @param options.assertion - Natural language assertion to validate (e.g. "The cart shows 3 items") |
| 29 | + * @param options.expect - Playwright expect function, used to fail the test on assertion failure |
| 30 | + * @param options.effort - "low" (default) or "high" — high enables thinking mode for deeper analysis |
| 31 | + * @param options.images - Optional base64 screenshot images to provide to the models |
| 32 | + * @param options.failSilently - When true, returns the result without failing the test |
| 33 | + * @param options.test - Playwright test instance for attaching metadata |
| 34 | + * @returns A string summary of the assertion result |
| 35 | + * @throws Fails the Playwright test via expect when assertion fails (unless failSilently is true) |
| 36 | + * |
| 37 | + * @example |
| 38 | + * ```typescript |
| 39 | + * await assert({ |
| 40 | + * page, |
| 41 | + * assertion: "The dashboard shows 3 active projects", |
| 42 | + * expect, |
| 43 | + * effort: "high", |
| 44 | + * }); |
| 45 | + * ``` |
| 46 | + */ |
| 47 | +const assert = async ({ page, assertion, test, expect, effort = "low", images, failSilently, maxRetries = 1, onRetry = (retryCount, previousResult) => { }, }) => { |
| 48 | + const thinkingEnabled = effort === "high"; |
| 49 | + const runFullAssertion = async () => { |
| 50 | + const snapshot = await (0, utils_1.safeSnapshot)(page); |
| 51 | + const imageContent = images |
| 52 | + ? images.map((image) => ({ type: "image", image })) |
| 53 | + : [ |
| 54 | + { |
| 55 | + type: "image", |
| 56 | + image: (await (0, utils_1.resolvePage)(page).screenshot({ fullPage: false })).toString("base64"), |
| 57 | + }, |
| 58 | + ]; |
| 59 | + const basePrompt = ` |
| 60 | +You are an AI-powered QA Agent designed to test web applications. |
| 61 | +
|
| 62 | +You have access to the following information. Based on this information, you'll tell us whether the assertion provided below should pass or not. |
| 63 | +${!images |
| 64 | + ? ` |
| 65 | +- An accessibility snapshot of the current page, which provides a detailed structure of the DOM |
| 66 | +- A screenshot of the current page` |
| 67 | + : "- Screenshots from various stages of the user flow"} |
| 68 | +
|
| 69 | +${!images |
| 70 | + ? ` |
| 71 | +<Snapshot> |
| 72 | +${snapshot} |
| 73 | +</Snapshot> |
| 74 | +` |
| 75 | + : ""} |
| 76 | +
|
| 77 | +<Assertion> |
| 78 | +${assertion} |
| 79 | +</Assertion> |
| 80 | +
|
| 81 | +<Rules> |
| 82 | +- First use the attached screenshot(s) to visually inspect the page and try to verify the assertion. |
| 83 | +- Only if the screenshot is not sufficient, use the accessibility snapshot (if supplied) to verify the assertion. |
| 84 | +- Don't create additional assertion conditions on your own - only consider the exact assertion provided above. |
| 85 | +- The assertion should pass if either the screenshot or the accessibility snapshot supports it. |
| 86 | +- Don't be overly strict or pedantic about exact wording. Focus on the intent and objective of the assertion rather than literal text matching. |
| 87 | +- Think like a practical QA tester - if the core functionality or state being asserted is present, the assertion should pass even if minor details differ. |
| 88 | +</Rules> |
| 89 | +
|
| 90 | +<OutputFormat> |
| 91 | + The output should contain the following information: |
| 92 | + - \`assertionPassed\`: A boolean indicating whether the assertion passed or not. |
| 93 | + - \`confidenceScore\`: A number between 0 and 100 indicating the confidence score of the assertion. |
| 94 | + - \`reasoning\`: A brief string explaining the reasoning behind the assertion. |
| 95 | +</OutputFormat> |
| 96 | +
|
| 97 | +Never hallucinate. Be truthful and if you are not sure, use a low confidence score. |
| 98 | +`; |
| 99 | + const messages = [ |
| 100 | + { |
| 101 | + role: "user", |
| 102 | + content: [ |
| 103 | + { |
| 104 | + type: "text", |
| 105 | + text: basePrompt, |
| 106 | + }, |
| 107 | + ...imageContent, |
| 108 | + ], |
| 109 | + }, |
| 110 | + ]; |
| 111 | + // Claude assertion function |
| 112 | + const getClaudeAssertion = async () => { |
| 113 | + // First get Claude's text response with thinking if enabled |
| 114 | + const { text } = await (0, ai_1.generateText)({ |
| 115 | + model: (0, models_1.resolveModel)((0, config_1.getModelId)("assertionPrimary")), |
| 116 | + temperature: 0, |
| 117 | + providerOptions: thinkingEnabled |
| 118 | + ? { |
| 119 | + anthropic: { |
| 120 | + thinking: { type: "enabled", budgetTokens: constants_1.THINKING_BUDGET_DEFAULT }, |
| 121 | + }, |
| 122 | + openrouter: { |
| 123 | + reasoning: { max_tokens: constants_1.THINKING_BUDGET_DEFAULT }, |
| 124 | + }, |
| 125 | + } |
| 126 | + : undefined, |
| 127 | + messages, |
| 128 | + }); |
| 129 | + // Convert Claude's response to structured format using Haiku |
| 130 | + const { output } = await (0, ai_1.generateText)({ |
| 131 | + model: (0, models_1.resolveModel)((0, config_1.getModelId)("assertionPrimary")), |
| 132 | + temperature: 0.1, |
| 133 | + prompt: `Convert the following text output into a valid JSON object with the specified properties:\n\n${text}`, |
| 134 | + output: ai_1.Output.object({ schema: assertionSchema }), |
| 135 | + }); |
| 136 | + return output; |
| 137 | + }; |
| 138 | + // Gemini assertion function |
| 139 | + const getGeminiAssertion = async () => { |
| 140 | + const { output } = await (0, ai_1.generateText)({ |
| 141 | + model: (0, models_1.resolveModel)((0, config_1.getModelId)("assertionSecondary")), |
| 142 | + temperature: 0, |
| 143 | + providerOptions: thinkingEnabled |
| 144 | + ? { |
| 145 | + google: { |
| 146 | + thinkingConfig: { |
| 147 | + thinkingBudget: constants_1.THINKING_BUDGET_DEFAULT, |
| 148 | + }, |
| 149 | + }, |
| 150 | + openrouter: { |
| 151 | + reasoning: { max_tokens: constants_1.THINKING_BUDGET_DEFAULT }, |
| 152 | + }, |
| 153 | + } |
| 154 | + : undefined, |
| 155 | + messages, |
| 156 | + output: ai_1.Output.object({ schema: assertionSchema }), |
| 157 | + }); |
| 158 | + return output; |
| 159 | + }; |
| 160 | + // Arbiter function using Gemini 2.5 Pro with thinking enabled |
| 161 | + const getArbiterDecision = async (claudeResult, geminiResult) => { |
| 162 | + const arbiterPrompt = ` |
| 163 | +You are an AI arbiter tasked with resolving a disagreement between two AI models about an assertion. |
| 164 | +
|
| 165 | +Claude's Assessment: |
| 166 | +- Assertion Passed: ${claudeResult.assertionPassed} |
| 167 | +- Confidence: ${claudeResult.confidenceScore}% |
| 168 | +- Reasoning: ${claudeResult.reasoning} |
| 169 | +
|
| 170 | +Gemini's Assessment: |
| 171 | +- Assertion Passed: ${geminiResult.assertionPassed} |
| 172 | +- Confidence: ${geminiResult.confidenceScore}% |
| 173 | +- Reasoning: ${geminiResult.reasoning} |
| 174 | +
|
| 175 | +${!images |
| 176 | + ? ` |
| 177 | +<Snapshot> |
| 178 | +${snapshot} |
| 179 | +</Snapshot> |
| 180 | +` |
| 181 | + : ""} |
| 182 | +
|
| 183 | +<Assertion> |
| 184 | +${assertion} |
| 185 | +</Assertion> |
| 186 | +
|
| 187 | +Please carefully review the evidence (screenshot and accessibility snapshot (when provided)) and make the final determination. Consider both models' reasoning but make your own independent assessment. |
| 188 | +
|
| 189 | +<Rules> |
| 190 | +- Make your own independent evaluation based on the evidence |
| 191 | +- Don't simply pick one model's answer - analyze the situation yourself |
| 192 | +- Provide clear reasoning for your decision |
| 193 | +- Be decisive - this is the final answer |
| 194 | +- First use the attached screenshot(s) to visually inspect the page and try to verify the assertion. |
| 195 | +- Only if the screenshot is not sufficient, use the accessibility snapshot (if supplied) to verify the assertion. |
| 196 | +- Don't create additional assertion conditions on your own - only consider the exact assertion provided above. |
| 197 | +- The assertion should pass if either the screenshot or the accessibility snapshot supports it. |
| 198 | +- Don't be overly strict or pedantic about exact wording. Focus on the intent and objective of the assertion rather than literal text matching. |
| 199 | +- Think like a practical QA tester - if the core functionality or state being asserted is present, the assertion should pass even if minor details differ. |
| 200 | +</Rules> |
| 201 | +`; |
| 202 | + const arbiterMessages = [ |
| 203 | + { |
| 204 | + role: "user", |
| 205 | + content: [ |
| 206 | + { |
| 207 | + type: "text", |
| 208 | + text: arbiterPrompt, |
| 209 | + }, |
| 210 | + ...imageContent, |
| 211 | + ], |
| 212 | + }, |
| 213 | + ]; |
| 214 | + const { output } = await (0, ai_1.generateText)({ |
| 215 | + model: (0, models_1.resolveModel)((0, config_1.getModelId)("assertionArbiter")), |
| 216 | + temperature: 0, |
| 217 | + providerOptions: { |
| 218 | + google: { |
| 219 | + thinkingConfig: { |
| 220 | + thinkingBudget: constants_1.THINKING_BUDGET_DEFAULT, |
| 221 | + }, |
| 222 | + }, |
| 223 | + openrouter: { |
| 224 | + reasoning: { max_tokens: constants_1.THINKING_BUDGET_DEFAULT }, |
| 225 | + }, |
| 226 | + }, |
| 227 | + messages: arbiterMessages, |
| 228 | + output: ai_1.Output.object({ schema: assertionSchema }), |
| 229 | + }); |
| 230 | + return output; |
| 231 | + }; |
| 232 | + const runAssertion = async (attempt = 0) => { |
| 233 | + try { |
| 234 | + // Run both models in parallel for speed optimization |
| 235 | + const [claudeResult, geminiResult] = await Promise.all([ |
| 236 | + (0, utils_1.withTimeout)(getClaudeAssertion(), constants_1.ASSERTION_MODEL_TIMEOUT), |
| 237 | + (0, utils_1.withTimeout)(getGeminiAssertion(), constants_1.ASSERTION_MODEL_TIMEOUT), |
| 238 | + ]); |
| 239 | + // Check if models disagree on assertionPassed |
| 240 | + if (claudeResult.assertionPassed !== geminiResult.assertionPassed) { |
| 241 | + logger_1.logger.debug("Models disagree on assertion result, consulting arbiter..."); |
| 242 | + const arbiterResult = await (0, utils_1.withTimeout)(getArbiterDecision(claudeResult, geminiResult), constants_1.ASSERTION_MODEL_TIMEOUT); |
| 243 | + return { |
| 244 | + assertionPassed: arbiterResult.assertionPassed, |
| 245 | + confidenceScore: arbiterResult.confidenceScore, |
| 246 | + reasoning: arbiterResult.reasoning, |
| 247 | + }; |
| 248 | + } |
| 249 | + // Assertion passes only if both models agree it should pass |
| 250 | + const assertionPassed = claudeResult.assertionPassed && geminiResult.assertionPassed; |
| 251 | + // Calculate average confidence score |
| 252 | + const confidenceScore = (claudeResult.confidenceScore + geminiResult.confidenceScore) / 2; |
| 253 | + // For now take Gemini's reasoning for simplicity |
| 254 | + const reasoning = geminiResult.reasoning; |
| 255 | + return { |
| 256 | + assertionPassed, |
| 257 | + confidenceScore: Math.round(confidenceScore), |
| 258 | + reasoning, |
| 259 | + }; |
| 260 | + } |
| 261 | + catch (error) { |
| 262 | + if (attempt < 1) { |
| 263 | + logger_1.logger.debug("Retrying assertion due to error..."); |
| 264 | + return await runAssertion(attempt + 1); |
| 265 | + } |
| 266 | + logger_1.logger.error({ err: error }, "Error running assertions after multiple retries"); |
| 267 | + throw error; |
| 268 | + } |
| 269 | + }; |
| 270 | + return await runAssertion(); |
| 271 | + }; |
| 272 | + // Run assertion with retry on failure |
| 273 | + let result = await runFullAssertion(); |
| 274 | + for (let retry = 0; retry < maxRetries && !result.assertionPassed; retry++) { |
| 275 | + logger_1.logger.debug("Assertion failed, retrying with fresh snapshot and screenshot..."); |
| 276 | + onRetry(retry, result); |
| 277 | + result = await runFullAssertion(); |
| 278 | + } |
| 279 | + const { assertionPassed, reasoning } = result; |
| 280 | + test?.info().annotations.push({ |
| 281 | + type: "AI Summary", |
| 282 | + description: reasoning, |
| 283 | + }); |
| 284 | + const expectStatus = assertionPassed ? "✅ passed" : "❌ failed"; |
| 285 | + if (!failSilently) { |
| 286 | + expect(assertionPassed, reasoning).toBe(true); |
| 287 | + } |
| 288 | + return `${reasoning}\n\n[Assertion ${expectStatus}]`; |
| 289 | +}; |
| 290 | +exports.assert = assert; |
0 commit comments