Replies: 1 comment
-
Any updates? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have two meshes, let's call them A and B, and I would like to use bullet to measure the minimal distance between any pair of of their vertices. Mesh A could theoretically be approximated by a few convex hulls, but mesh B cannot (it represents some fairly rough terrain).
So far, I've been looking at this pybullet example (though I'll be working in C++ for my actual implementation), and it seems very promising. My concern is that while the documentation assures me that I can load in static concave meshes, and
p.getClosestPoints()
happily accepts those concave meshes as inputs, I have not been thoroughly convinced that bullet isn't taking convex hulls in order to perform the distance calculation. More importantly, I've been looking through the C++ documentation, and I can't find any implementation of thegetClosestPoints()
interface that accepts concave shapes or tri-meshes. I'd appreciate any pointers or assurances about what's happening behind the scenes. Thanks!Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions