Skip to content

Tuning grafana client queries to have domain as a filter #6856

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

vishwa-uber
Copy link
Contributor

Tuning the queries for client - adding domain filters for all prometheus queries

Why?
queries need to incorporate the filters from above

How did you test it?
locally

Potential risks
low

"editorMode": "code",
"expr": "avg by(operation) (rate(cadence_client_errors[$__rate_interval]))",
"editorMode": "builder",
"expr": "avg by(operation) (rate(cadence_client_errors{domain!~\"$domain\"}[$__rate_interval]))",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"average for all other domains" (!~) seems backwards?

"options": {
"mode": "exclude",
"names": [
"HistoryClientRespondDecisionTaskCompleted"
Copy link
Member

@Groxx Groxx May 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's often worth excluding poll-responses since they generally don't have issues like this and they just retry. but an exclude by regex for respond(decision|activity) is probably best in that case.

Copy link
Member

@Groxx Groxx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some small things worth verifying or changing (but feel free to skip the exclude one if you don't have a feel for that one yet), but merge when done 👍

@vishwa-uber vishwa-uber enabled auto-merge (squash) May 6, 2025 21:39
@vishwa-uber vishwa-uber merged commit 6c9808e into cadence-workflow:master May 13, 2025
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants