SSO should not require an enterprise license #16680
Unanswered
neuhaus
asked this question in
Self-Hosting
Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
|
Yeah, this is true. I am struggling to find new open source alternatives where SSO is free to use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Locking security-enhancing features such as SSO behind a paywall is not a good look for a product. Cal.com seemed like a good fit for our organization but we chose an alternative instead; the lack of SSO on the self-hosted, non-enterprise, offering being one of the major factors. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I think it's a pity that SSO is an enterprise only feature for self-hosted cal.com. Even if you have a small company with just 10 users or so, you don't want them to require yet another password. I hope you reconsider and make it a community feature.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions