Replies: 2 comments
-
@dominikhorn93 as it is about visualization - do you have an idea? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@zambrovski not possible right now. We don't save any instanceIds in the event.
If we change that, we could extend the report with a "select instance" functionality |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm using signaling between two different processes, but the signal name is tied to the business key so that a signal from Process 1 won't affect all of the processes of Process2, only those with the same business key. Operationally, this is working well.
From a test perspective, I'm starting up 2 instances of Process 1 and 2 instances of Process 2 and only 1 pair of them have a matching Business Key. I want to assert that only the matching Process 2 instance is affected. Again, the test setup works.
However, in the visualization of the process coverage, the visuals are consolidated so you see the results/status of both instances (the two instances of Process 1 are combined and the two instances of Process 2 are combined).
Is there a way to separate the reporting into a per-instance view for this kind of interaction test?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions