@jasdeepsingh and other authors/contributors
Hello guys, I'm @mshibuya a maintainer of the CarrierWave project.
Looks like this project carrierwave-google-storage is not so actively maintained. It's sad for me, because I think this project deserves more attention.
As the CarrierWave project, currently I'm thinking of the possibility to move away from the Fog gem. Fog comes with a lot of features that CarrierWave doesn't need, and the maintenance status is not so ideal (varies among cloud providers). So the idea is to encourage users to use CarrierWave integration libraries, which depends on not Fog but the cloud provider's official libraries, just like carrierwave-google-storage does.
Hence here's my question, is there anything I can help to maintain this project? If you're fine with it, I'm willing to become a maintainer to support managing dependencies and releasing. Or in case you don't have enough bandwidth to keep maintaining this, it may be worth considering transfer of the maintenance ownership to the carrierwaveuploader organization, just like what was done to carrierwave-aws.
Thank you for your attention, looking forward to hearing back from you!
@jasdeepsingh and other authors/contributors
Hello guys, I'm @mshibuya a maintainer of the CarrierWave project.
Looks like this project carrierwave-google-storage is not so actively maintained. It's sad for me, because I think this project deserves more attention.
As the CarrierWave project, currently I'm thinking of the possibility to move away from the Fog gem. Fog comes with a lot of features that CarrierWave doesn't need, and the maintenance status is not so ideal (varies among cloud providers). So the idea is to encourage users to use CarrierWave integration libraries, which depends on not Fog but the cloud provider's official libraries, just like carrierwave-google-storage does.
Hence here's my question, is there anything I can help to maintain this project? If you're fine with it, I'm willing to become a maintainer to support managing dependencies and releasing. Or in case you don't have enough bandwidth to keep maintaining this, it may be worth considering transfer of the maintenance ownership to the carrierwaveuploader organization, just like what was done to carrierwave-aws.
Thank you for your attention, looking forward to hearing back from you!