Author: Ferrera
Year: 2020
- Simulated and real data
- Artificial lightening mandatory
- turbidity effects due to floating particles
- front-end with optical flow and back end with bundle adjustment (classic...)
Feature tracking:
- LKT to be robust to repetitive patterns
- Shi and Tomasi algorithm to detect Harris corners
- Benchmark of keypoint + descriptors (ORB, SURF...) and LKT with Harris
- The search for matching descriptors is in 40*40 pixel zone
- Harris corner is the only one to detect enough features per images
- Epipolar check + RANSAC
- final solution: Harris with LKT
VO:
- pb of LKT: only available for succesive frames. Not robust to dynamic env => need of a retracking mechanism
- Filtering of pts with forward/backward optical flow and essential matrix estimation in a RANSAC fation
- Retracking of lost features by keeping a small window of the most recent frames
- P3P in a RANSAC fation + BA for pose estimation between frames
- KF voting with parallax and number of corespondence
- Adaptive selection of KF included in the BA pb
Results:
- SVO and LSD require high frame rate
- LSD fails because it is based on strong gradient that are not frequent underwater
- groundtruth with SFM software Colmap
- BoW doesn't work for loop closure
Système trés similaire à PAVO mais bien rédigé. Continuer de lire des paps sur la VO sous marine, un bon exemple de recherche applicative du SLAM