First, thanks for this great package! I use it almost every day.
I found that the insertion mechanism has some inconsistency when I have a pair after lr.
The problem rises from the electric-pair-mode, which I also use frequently.
Thus when typing lr( or lr[, I get lr() or lr[], with the cursor in the middle of the parentheses.
In this case, I can still hit <tab> and expand the sequence.
The problem is that lr() becomes \left( \right)).
While this is reasonable due to the additional ) at the end, I notice that lr[] does become \left[ \right], as wanted, so I'm wondering if we can get the similar expansion for lr(), i.e. \left( \right).
Thank you.
First, thanks for this great package! I use it almost every day.
I found that the insertion mechanism has some inconsistency when I have a pair after
lr.The problem rises from the electric-pair-mode, which I also use frequently.
Thus when typing
lr(orlr[, I getlr()orlr[], with the cursor in the middle of the parentheses.In this case, I can still hit
<tab>and expand the sequence.The problem is that
lr()becomes\left( \right)).While this is reasonable due to the additional
)at the end, I notice thatlr[]does become\left[ \right], as wanted, so I'm wondering if we can get the similar expansion forlr(), i.e.\left( \right).Thank you.