my opinion about rethink versions

[error-reporting]

in my opinion v055n is superior because it doesn't have recent issues

[ignoramous]

Yes, it is the last stable release, even if it also isn't without bugs.

v055o+ sports a significantly changed network engine, and folks should consider switching to those v055o+ as they get stable over time (the current on is v055u, which is pretty decent, if I can say so myself).

[error-reporting]

@ignoramous can you please answer my question in #2359 (reply in thread)?

[ignoramous]

Not sure what reply you're looking for? Whatever you're reporting, shouldn't happen, regardless of Split DNS. From what I recall of the implementation, Isolated apps are supposed to be bound to per-app IP/Domain allow/trust rules exclusively.

[error-reporting]

screenshots

three example domain that got through in the dns entry even though i did not put exception in per app isolate for puretuber: firebaseinstallations.googleapis.com, beacons.gvt2.com and www.google.com

[error-reporting]

@ignoramous update: it seems actually the dns cache feature make it look like that as there's no more apparent dns request leak from isolated apps after turning cache off i.e may not be actual request got through in the dns entry

[ignoramous]

Split DNS + Caching works best on Android 13 or above.

And I can see why Caches "confuse" mapping between domain names & IPs. We've tried to add some heuristics over the last few releases to make this "confusion" less and less common... that is, v055t or later would be better at not mixing up domain names and IPs.

With Google APIs / websites, in particular, the IPs and domain names have high chances of getting "confused" (cross-mapped) as Google owns a large pool of IPs from which most (if not all) Google services are accessible over TLS (or HTTP).