Context

This issue proposes repository improvements to make Oikoscope contributions and outputs easier to verify for external reviewers and collaborators.

Proposed changes

• Align canonical Oikoscope links across docs and metadata
• Add and clarify verifiable outputs in README/docs (schema, dataset, meeting records)
• Add and verify data validation workflow for oikoscope/** changes
• Standardize logo and favicon asset placement for consistent project identity

Why this matters

These updates improve transparency, reproducibility, and reviewer confidence while keeping process aligned with CHAOSS contribution and governance norms.

Scope

In scope:

• Documentation, metadata, CI validation, and project assets

Out of scope:

• Non-repository application fields (letters, hourly rate, external endorsements)

Success criteria

• Public links resolve and are consistent
• Validation runs automatically on relevant changes
• README/docs clearly show current deliverables and evidence