Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Hi @harmw, An endpoint to see a single providers sounds reasonable, and easy to implement. Regarding markdown, I'm not so sure. I guess we can add if the code is straightforward enough. I would suggest you to submit separate PRs for each feature (provider endpoint + markdown support). If we decide to add markdown, I'd vote to check one of these instead of
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
hm, that's not bad at all 🤔 having .md to decide on output meanwhile: #231 markdown: #232 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Working on a quick PR to list models per providers, in addition to the general
/v2/providersjson blob:The
/v2/providersendpoint remains, obviously, but the change introduces/v2/providers/foobarto limit returning just json for that provider. And there's aprettyparameter to have it return a markdown table for when you're just interested in available models/context/pricing bits.Alternative approach is embedding as another CLI part, but I figured that might be just too much. IMHO this is good enough 😅
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions