sProof Luminary099/TIME_OF_FREE_FALL#975
Open
0xDI wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Fix two transcription errors found by comparing against scan pages 1275-1276: - Page 1275 (R0293-R0295): MOD BY: 3/4/5 -> MOD NO: 3/4/5 The modification number field was transcribed as MOD BY instead of MOD NO for entries 3, 4, and 5. MOD NO: 1 and MOD NO: 2 above them were correct. - Page 1276 (R0393): M:(-36+2N4) -> M:(-36+2NR) The R in NR was misread as 4. Every other instance of this scale factor in the file correctly reads 2NR. Partially resolves chrislgarry#647
0xDI
force-pushed
the
proof/luminary099-time-of-free-fall
branch
from
0a4350d to
eabf9de
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two transcription errors found against scan pages 1275–1276.
MOD BY: 3/4/5→MOD NO: 3/4/5. The number field was misread for entries 3–5; entries 1 and 2 directly above were transcribed correctly.M:(-36+2N4)→M:(-36+2NR). TheRinNRwas misread as4. Every other occurrence of this scale factor in the file reads2NR.Closes #647