Skip to content

Extension's extraCityObjects schema does not reflect the specs #139

@balazsdukai

Description

@balazsdukai

The specs declare 6 rules to follow to define new CityObjects, but according to the schema anything is allowed in a CityObject:

"(\\+)([A-Z])\\w+": {}

Shouldn't the extraCityObjects validation schema be more specific?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions