In CityGML, you can define ADE attributes for abstract CityGML classes, and these attributes are inherited and available for all subclasses. For example, when you add an attribute myAdeAttribute to the abstract root class AbstractCityObject, you can automatically use this attribute for all derived instances like Building, CityFurniture, or LandUse.
In a CityJSON extension schema, you can assign additional attributes to city objects through the "extraAttributes" object. The CityJSON schema itself uses some sort of "abstract" definitions like, for example, "_AbstractCityObject" (see https://3d.bk.tudelft.nl/schemas/cityjson/2.0.1/cityobjects.schema.json).
Is it allowed and supported to reference this "_AbstractCityObject" in an extension schema like shown below?
{
"type": "CityJSONExtension",
...
"extraAttributes": {
"_AbstractCityObject": {
"+myAdeAttribute": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
}
In CityGML, you can define ADE attributes for abstract CityGML classes, and these attributes are inherited and available for all subclasses. For example, when you add an attribute
myAdeAttributeto the abstract root classAbstractCityObject, you can automatically use this attribute for all derived instances likeBuilding,CityFurniture, orLandUse.In a CityJSON extension schema, you can assign additional attributes to city objects through the
"extraAttributes"object. The CityJSON schema itself uses some sort of "abstract" definitions like, for example,"_AbstractCityObject"(see https://3d.bk.tudelft.nl/schemas/cityjson/2.0.1/cityobjects.schema.json).Is it allowed and supported to reference this
"_AbstractCityObject"in an extension schema like shown below?