General Online Logit Distillation (GOLD) is an extension of Universal Logit Distillation (ULD) that supports student/teacher pairs with different tokenizers. It aligns the textual spans produced by both tokenizers and merges the associated logits so no completion tokens are dropped. This enables cross-tokenizer knowledge distillation, including mixed model families (for example, LLaMA students with Qwen teachers).
Key capabilities:
- Cross-tokenizer alignment – GOLD incrementally decodes the student and teacher tokens, groups passages with the same visible text, and merges probabilities inside each group. This guarantees loss terms are computed over the full completion even when token boundaries differ.
- Hybrid ULD loss – when
uld_use_hybrid_lossis enabled, GOLD compares exact vocabulary matches directly and falls back to the original sorted-probability ULD loss for unmatched tokens. This improves stability for students whose vocabularies only partially overlap with the teacher. - Seamless integration with GKD – GOLD inherits the on-policy vs. off-policy scheduling from the [
experimental.gkd.GKDTrainer], so you can combine sequence-level KD, generalized JSD, and cross-tokenizer distillation in a single training run.
Note
GOLD is currently part of the trl.experimental namespace. APIs may change without notice while the feature is iterated on.
The [GOLDTrainer] subclasses [SFTTrainer] and accepts the same datasets as other TRL trainers (lists of ChatML style
messages). Important configuration flags on [GOLDConfig] include:
use_uld_loss– toggles Universal Logit Distillation. Set this toTruefor cross-tokenizer setups.teacher_tokenizer_name_or_path– required whenuse_uld_loss=True; GOLD uses the teacher tokenizer to align tokens.uld_use_hybrid_loss,uld_hybrid_matched_weight,uld_hybrid_unmatched_weight– enables and weights the hybrid matched/unmatched loss.beta,lmbda,seq_kd– inherited from [experimental.gkd.GKDConfig], controlling the generalized JSD interpolation and on-policy sampling ratio.num_generations,generation_batch_size– control buffered rollout generation across gradient accumulation windows.generation_batch_sizeis the number of unique prompts per worker per optimizer step.student_model_revisionandmodel_revision– ifstudent_model_revisionis unset, GOLD usesmodel_revision. If both are set and differ, GOLD raises an error to avoid loading different revisions for training vs generation.
A minimal end-to-end example:
from datasets import load_dataset
from trl.experimental.gold import GOLDConfig, GOLDTrainer
train_dataset = load_dataset(
"HuggingFaceTB/OpenR1-Math-220k-default-verified",
"all",
split="train[:1024]",
)
trainer = GOLDTrainer(
model="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct",
teacher_model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct",
args=GOLDConfig(output_dir="gold-model", use_uld_loss=True, teacher_tokenizer_name_or_path="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct"),
train_dataset=train_dataset,
)
trainer.train()For quick-start workflows you can rely on string identifiers as shown above—the trainer will load the model and tokenizer for you. Explicitly instantiating AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, or populating GOLDConfig is recommended only for advanced use cases where you need fine-grained control over initialization.
A more explicit setup might look like this when you need to customise model loading, tokenizer settings, or training arguments:
from datasets import load_dataset
from trl import GOLDConfig, GOLDTrainer
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
student_name = "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct"
teacher_name = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(student_name)
if tokenizer.pad_token is None:
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(student_name)
teacher_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(teacher_name)
train_dataset = load_dataset(
"HuggingFaceTB/Countdown-Task-GOLD",
"verified_Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct",
split="train",
)
training_args = GOLDConfig(
output_dir="gold-model",
per_device_train_batch_size=1,
teacher_model_name_or_path=teacher_name,
teacher_tokenizer_name_or_path=teacher_name,
use_uld_loss=True,
uld_use_hybrid_loss=True,
)
trainer = GOLDTrainer(
model=model,
teacher_model=teacher_model,
args=training_args,
processing_class=tokenizer,
train_dataset=train_dataset,
)
trainer.train()Note
GOLD buffers one full optimizer-window generation batch (per_device_train_batch_size * gradient_accumulation_steps)
and reuses it across accumulation steps. If the final batch is undersized, GOLD warns and drops that last batch
(Dropping last batch due to unexpected batch size). Set dataloader_drop_last=True to avoid this warning.
GOLD requires a conversational language modeling dataset, e.g.:
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "What color is the sky?"},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "It is blue."}]}GOLDTrainer keeps the raw messages so the ChatML collator can construct prompts and completions with the correct
boundaries.
When student and teacher use different tokenizers, the same text may be split differently:
- Student:
"Hugging Face"→ 1 token - Teacher:
"Hugging"," Face"→ 2 tokens
GOLD aligns these sequences and merges the teacher's multi-token probabilities into a single distribution that can be compared with the student's single-token distribution.
For a teacher sequence of tokens [token₀, token₁, ..., tokenₖ] that maps to a single student token, GOLD computes:
P_merged(y) = P(y | context) × P(token₁ | token₀, context) × ... × P(tokenₖ | ..., context)
where:
P(y | context)is the marginal probability distribution over all vocabulary tokens at the first positionP(tokenᵢ | ..., context)are scalar conditional probabilities of the actual tokens that were generated
Key insight: Only the conditional probabilities of the actual continuation tokens are extracted as scalars. The full marginal distribution at the first position is then scaled by multiplying these scalar probabilities.
This ensures:
- Correct joint probability for the actual generated sequence (by the chain rule)
- Reasonable approximation for counterfactual tokens (scaled by the same continuation likelihood)
- Unnormalized distributions that preserve the correct relative probabilities for ULD loss computation
Given:
P(x₀): ["HF": 0.6, "is": 0.3, "cool": 0.1]
P(x₁ | "HF"): ["HF": 0.05, "is": 0.9, "cool": 0.05]
If tokens 0 and 1 are merged, and the actual sequence was ["HF", "is"]:
P_merged("HF") = 0.6 × 0.9 = 0.54 ✓ (correct joint probability)
P_merged("is") = 0.3 × 0.9 = 0.27
P_merged("cool") = 0.1 × 0.9 = 0.09
The merged distribution is unnormalized (sums to 0.81), but this is intentional and correct for ULD loss computation, which uses sorting and L1 distance.
[[autodoc]] experimental.gold.GOLDTrainer - train - generate_on_policy_outputs - save_model - push_to_hub
[[autodoc]] experimental.gold.GOLDConfig