Replies: 2 comments
-
|
I think since it is still just a scalar function then that meets the scope of the project. We can have either a special node or simply a special function available to formula nodes, which can generate deterministic pseudorandom numbers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
This discussion was converted to issue #130 and implemented with PR #140 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi @nsmith- , all,
@lgray brought up the idea of going a step further in what is provided via correctionlib. One classical example of where one would profit from harmonizing is jet energy smearing, see e.g. https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/JetResolution#Smearing_procedures
Depending on whether or not a genjet is matched (well enough) to a recojet, either the difference between genjet pt and recojet pt is changed or some stochastic smearing is applied. Ideally, the result would be reproducible, e.g. deciding on a standard way to calculate a random number seed (e.g. requiring event/lumisection as input).
Input would be:
recopt, recoeta, genpt, (info for random number seed)
Output:
smeared recopt
Would this still be doable and within scope of correctionlib @nsmith- ?
Cheers,
Henning
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions