Question: Should "Projects and products" show all CNCF projects?

[krumware]

Currently, not all CNCF projects are available by selecting the "Projects and products" group, and the Status -> CNCF Projects filter, which is misleading.

Is this intentional, or do projects that aren't currently listed need to update their category or second_path in the cncf/landscape landscape.yml?

For example, k3s, CozyStack, Flatcar, and Kubeclipper are not available under the "Project and products", and are rather only available under "Certified partners and providers", the name of which is also misleading.

k0s on the other hand, is available in both locations, because it's first path is Orchestration & Management -> Scheduling & Orchestration and it's second_path is Platform / Certified Kubernetes - Distribution. Arguably, those categories should be flipped. But regardless, should k3s, CozyStack, Flatcar, and Kubeclipper have Orchestration & Management / Scheduling & Orchestration added as a second path? And should other projects be advised to also add additional paths? Or perhaps is "Projects and products" missing some categories?

[tegioz]

Hi @krumware 👋

I'll move this issue to the cncf/landscape repository, that hosts the bits specific to the CNCF landscape (data files, logos, etc), as well as discussions/prs about categories and new items. This repository contains the landscapes generator 🙂

Using the second_path field would be a great way to solve this though (but not sure if they were left out for any reason).