TUF analysis: IA table changes

[chalin]

Further proposed changes to the table under https://github.com/cncf/techdocs/blob/main/analyses/0012-TUF/implementation.md#provide-project-meeting-links-and-calendar:

• Put Adoptions back under Community

I think that we might need a top-level entry (that shows up in the top-nav too), named Security. What do you think @lukpueh.

In terms of IA:

• Security, with the following page content (they don't need to be subpages, though they can be):
  • Audits
  • Reporting issues

WDYT @lukpueh?

[Dindihub]

Further proposed changes to the table under https://github.com/cncf/techdocs/blob/main/analyses/0012-TUF/implementation.md#provide-project-meeting-links-and-calendar:

• Put Adoptions back under Community

I think that we might need a top-level entry (that shows up in the top-nav too), named Security. What do you think @lukpueh. In terms of IA:

• Security, with the following page content (they don't need to be subpages, though they can be):

  • Audits
  • Reporting issues

WDYT @lukpueh?

@chalin Noted. I'll wait for @lukpueh views on the structure before I create a PR.

[lukpueh]

I think it's fine. IMO the canonical location for project-wide security policy (to report security issues) is: https://github.com/theupdateframework/community/security/policy

What if we set up a policy there, and point to it from theupdateframework.io/security?

[chalin]

I'd do it the other way around. If there's any content in https://github.com/theupdateframework/community/security/policy, it should point back to the website (and have no other content). That is, make the website security section/pages the canonical reference. WDYT?

[lukpueh]

I'd do it the other way around. If there's any content in https://github.com/theupdateframework/community/security/policy, it should point back to the website (and have no other content). That is, make the website security section/pages the canonical reference. WDYT?

Work for me.

[chalin]

@chalin Noted. I'll wait for @lukpueh views on the structure before I create a PR.

Any further doubts before you proceed @Dindihub?

[Dindihub]

@chalin Noted. I'll wait for @lukpueh views on the structure before I create a PR.

Any further doubts before you proceed @Dindihub?

Hi @chalin . So this is how I understood the IA for this section:
Security :

• Audit
• Reporting issues (To have the same content as on the current website. Add a reporting issues link on the community/policy section on GitHub pointing to the website)