Experiments with MIPLIB 2017 and address sanitizer #756
h-g-s
started this conversation in
Discussion
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
Thanks for doing this! A couple of questions.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Attaching the non-empty error files below so that it easier to check. W.r.t. to the two instances
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Fixed one memory leak. Could not reproduce error in Cgl012Cut and do not know enough about that code. Fixed (I think) two asserts - could not reproduce other errors. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
Before doing more extensive benchmarking experiments, I executed CBC compiled with debug info and address sanitizer flags to check if there was some clear leak / memory related problem in master in any of the MIPLIB 2017 instances. In the following excel file there is summary of these results.
CBC experiments master December 2025.xlsx
In the Errors sheet of the attached spreadsheet all error messages are detailed. Some are assertion failures and some are related to address sanitizer (please note that you have to click twice on the cell for the error to appear fully). One of the errors, for example, is:
In the Timeouts sheet there is a list of instances which exceeded the time limit in 1000 seconds without stopping. This is probably due to a hard to solve LP relaxation as I don't think CBC checks for time limit at this phase.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions