Skip to content

Improve package naming convention #162

@xmunoz

Description

@xmunoz

We are currently using a very coarse algorithm to compute package names. In #161, @svigerske indicated a preferred solution:
#161 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions