Replies: 6 comments
-
Hi Sean, I think in the usage of the API so far I have more instances where I want to perform the adaptation than instances where I don't. What about you? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Mine are in the order CAT02 (colour science, ACES, most camera vendors), Bradford (ICC/Photoshop, Red), XYZ scaling only (Baselight), None (replication of something else that is usually doing it wrong :-) other CATs are for matching historical reasons or in specific situations. Kevin |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yeah, I don't know why but it just struck me as odd when I noticed it was there. I've been playing around with using alternate white points for DCI P3 and ACES AP1 incarnations, which I can clearly accomplish via abother route, but just wanted to see if I was the only one who wasn't expecting it to be there. Seems that way :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would say my order is the same as Kevin's. The only time I use no CAT is for matrices for ACES "D60 sim" ODTs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thoroughly convinced with the present implementation :) Is there an ongoing forum of conversation outside of Issues ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@scoopxyz: Indeed! I'll ping you offline! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
source
This is a bit of a null issue, as I can already see both sides of the argument, but I just wanted to prompt a discussion around defaulting to using white point adaptation when creating RGB to RGB matrices, and whether people prefer the opt-out rather than opt-in model.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions