[ci] Use Slow Tests (#3865)

Author: patrick-ogrady

cryptography/src/bls12381/dkg/golden/evrf/mod.rs

@@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ impl VrfCommitments {
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
     use super::*;
+    use commonware_macros::test_group;
     use commonware_parallel::Sequential;
     use commonware_utils::test_rng;
     use std::sync::LazyLock;
@@ -769,6 +770,7 @@ mod tests {
     /// every test in this module uses 3.
     static TEST_SETUP: LazyLock<Setup> = LazyLock::new(|| Setup::new(NonZeroU32::new(3).unwrap()));
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn vrf_batch_checked_roundtrips_through_check_batch() {
         let mut rng = test_rng();
@@ -815,6 +817,7 @@ mod tests {
         assert_eq!(checked, &commitments.commitments);
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn check_batch_rejects_perturbed_commitments() {
         let mut rng = test_rng();
@@ -903,6 +906,7 @@ mod tests {
         assert!(result.is_empty());
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn check_batch_falls_back_to_per_sender_on_failure() {
         let mut rng = test_rng();

cryptography/src/bls12381/dkg/golden/mod.rs

@@ -1567,13 +1567,15 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("plan should succeed");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn multiple_dealers_multiple_players() {
         Plan::new(4, 7, 3)
             .run(&TEST_SETUP, 42, &Sequential)
             .expect("plan should succeed");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn many_dealers() {
         Plan::new(10, 5, 0)
@@ -1583,6 +1585,7 @@ mod tests {
 
     // Perturbation tests
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn bad_signature_filtered() {
         // 1 bad sig out of 4 dealers, DKG succeeds
@@ -1592,6 +1595,7 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("plan should succeed with 1 bad sig");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn output_dealers_excludes_filtered_dealers() {
         let mut rng = commonware_utils::test_rng();
@@ -1643,6 +1647,7 @@ mod tests {
         );
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn bad_signature_too_many() {
         // 3 bad sigs out of 4 dealers. quorum(4) = 3, so only 1 honest < 3.
@@ -1654,6 +1659,7 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("plan should handle expected failure");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn bad_share_filtered() {
         // 1 dealer sends bad share, DKG succeeds
@@ -1663,6 +1669,7 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("plan should succeed with 1 bad share");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn bad_share_too_many() {
         // 3 out of 4 dealers send bad shares. quorum(4) = 3, so only 1 honest < 3.
@@ -1674,6 +1681,7 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("plan should handle expected failure");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn bad_commitment_filtered() {
         Plan::new(4, 7, 3)
@@ -1682,6 +1690,7 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("plan should succeed with 1 bad commitment");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn missing_share_filtered() {
         Plan::new(4, 7, 3)
@@ -1690,6 +1699,7 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("plan should succeed with 1 missing share");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn shift_degree_filtered() {
         Plan::new(4, 7, 3)
@@ -1698,6 +1708,7 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("plan should succeed with 1 wrong degree dealer filtered");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn insufficient_dealers() {
         // Drop 3 out of 4 dealers. quorum(4) = 3, so only 1 < 3.
@@ -1711,6 +1722,7 @@ mod tests {
 
     // Reshare tests
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn reshare_happy_path() {
         Plan::new(4, 7, 3)
@@ -1719,6 +1731,7 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("reshare should succeed");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn reshare_replace_share_filtered() {
         Plan::new(4, 7, 3)
@@ -1728,6 +1741,7 @@ mod tests {
             .expect("reshare should succeed with 1 replaced share");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn reshare_replace_share_fails() {
         // 3 out of 4 dealers use wrong previous share. quorum(4) = 3, only 1 honest.
@@ -1780,6 +1794,7 @@ mod tests {
         assert!(matches!(result, Err(Error::UnknownDealer(_))));
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn unknown_player() {
         let mut rng = commonware_utils::test_rng();
@@ -1818,6 +1833,7 @@ mod tests {
         assert!(matches!(result, Err(Error::UnknownPlayer)));
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn missing_dealer_share_in_reshare() {
         let mut rng = commonware_utils::test_rng();
@@ -1860,6 +1876,7 @@ mod tests {
         assert!(matches!(result, Err(Error::MissingDealerShare)));
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn signed_dealer_log_roundtrip() {
         use commonware_parallel::Sequential;
@@ -1909,6 +1926,7 @@ mod tests {
         observe(&mut rng, &TEST_SETUP, &info, logs, &Sequential).expect("observe should succeed");
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn output_roundtrip() {
         let mut rng = commonware_utils::test_rng();
@@ -2056,6 +2074,7 @@ mod tests {
         assert!(matches!(result, Err(Error::NumDealers(0))));
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn info_rejects_reshare_dealer_outside_previous_players() {
         let mut rng = commonware_utils::test_rng();
@@ -2093,6 +2112,7 @@ mod tests {
         assert!(matches!(result, Err(Error::UnknownDealer(_))));
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test]
     fn info_rejects_reshare_with_too_few_dealers() {
         let mut rng = commonware_utils::test_rng();

storage/src/qmdb/current/mod.rs

@@ -2709,6 +2709,7 @@ pub mod tests {
         });
     }
 
+    #[test_group("slow")]
     #[test_traced("INFO")]
     fn test_all_variants_speculative_root_matches_committed() {
         let executor = deterministic::Runner::default();