Following #48, invalid recipes can be produced due to the warning at https://rattler-build.prefix.dev/latest/reference/recipe_file/#specifying-a-file-name. This was briefly discussed in https://discord.com/channels/1082332781146800168/1483742267641430171 and the verdict seemed to be that it would be good if convert avoided producing file_name for archive source files, perhaps instead omitting it and issuing a warning (or just rejecting the input and advising to remove fn?)
Maybe it can be clever and rename things in the rest of the recipe, but I think just making people aware that there is no easy direct translation would suffice.
Following #48, invalid recipes can be produced due to the warning at https://rattler-build.prefix.dev/latest/reference/recipe_file/#specifying-a-file-name. This was briefly discussed in https://discord.com/channels/1082332781146800168/1483742267641430171 and the verdict seemed to be that it would be good if
convertavoided producingfile_namefor archive source files, perhaps instead omitting it and issuing a warning (or just rejecting the input and advising to removefn?)Maybe it can be clever and rename things in the rest of the recipe, but I think just making people aware that there is no easy direct translation would suffice.