|
| 1 | +"""Heterogeneous Document RAG Evaluation with DeepEval. |
| 2 | +
|
| 3 | +This example demonstrates how to evaluate a financial RAG pipeline that |
| 4 | +retrieve chunks from mixed document types (10-K filings, earnings call |
| 5 | +transcripts, balance sheets) using document-type-specific thresholds. |
| 6 | +
|
| 7 | +Key features shown: |
| 8 | +1. Using LLMTestCase metadata to tag chunks by document_type. |
| 9 | +2. Using threshold_overrides (per PR #2785) to set different pass/fail |
| 10 | + thresholds per document type. |
| 11 | +3. Combining FaithfulnessMetric, ContextualPrecisionMetric, and |
| 12 | + ContextualRecallMetric in a single heterogeneous test run. |
| 13 | +4. Interpreting results: why structured documents (balance sheets) need |
| 14 | + higher thresholds than narrative documents (earnings calls). |
| 15 | +
|
| 16 | +Requires: OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable. |
| 17 | +Install: pip install deepeval |
| 18 | +""" |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +import os |
| 21 | +from deepeval import evaluate |
| 22 | +from deepeval.metrics import ( |
| 23 | + FaithfulnessMetric, |
| 24 | + ContextualPrecisionMetric, |
| 25 | + ContextualRecallMetric, |
| 26 | +) |
| 27 | +from deepeval.test_case import LLMTestCase |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 31 | +# Document-type threshold configuration |
| 32 | +# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 33 | +# Different document types warrant different pass/fail thresholds: |
| 34 | +# |
| 35 | +# - balance_sheet: High precision required (0.95). Structured numeric data |
| 36 | +# must be retrieved exactly; hallucinated figures are dangerous. |
| 37 | +# |
| 38 | +# - annual_report (10-K narrative): Moderate threshold (0.80). Some |
| 39 | +# paraphrase of narrative text is acceptable. |
| 40 | +# |
| 41 | +# - earnings_call: Lower threshold (0.70). Transcripts contain hedged |
| 42 | +# language and forward-looking statements that LLMs may paraphrase. |
| 43 | +# |
| 44 | +# - default: Applied when document_type metadata is absent (0.75). |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +THRESHOLD_OVERRIDES = { |
| 47 | + "balance_sheet": 0.95, |
| 48 | + "annual_report": 0.80, |
| 49 | + "earnings_call": 0.70, |
| 50 | + "default": 0.75, |
| 51 | +} |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 55 | +# Test cases |
| 56 | +# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +def build_test_cases(): |
| 59 | + """Build a mixed set of test cases representing a financial RAG pipeline. |
| 60 | +
|
| 61 | + Each test case includes a document_type metadata key that will be used |
| 62 | + by the threshold_overrides parameter (available in DeepEval >= 2.0, |
| 63 | + once PR #2785 is merged). |
| 64 | + """ |
| 65 | + test_cases = [] |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | + # --- Balance sheet query --- |
| 68 | + # High precision required: exact numeric retrieval from structured table. |
| 69 | + balance_sheet_case = LLMTestCase( |
| 70 | + input="What were total assets and total liabilities for FY2023?", |
| 71 | + actual_output=( |
| 72 | + "Total assets for FY2023 were $18.7 billion. " |
| 73 | + "Total liabilities were $11.2 billion." |
| 74 | + ), |
| 75 | + expected_output=( |
| 76 | + "Total assets: $18.7B. Total liabilities: $11.2B (FY2023)." |
| 77 | + ), |
| 78 | + retrieval_context=[ |
| 79 | + "| Metric | FY2023 | FY2022 |\n" |
| 80 | + "|--------|--------|--------|\n" |
| 81 | + "| Total Assets | $18.7B | $16.4B |\n" |
| 82 | + "| Total Liabilities | $11.2B | $10.1B |\n" |
| 83 | + "| Stockholders' Equity | $7.5B | $6.3B |", |
| 84 | + ], |
| 85 | + # Tag this test case with document type for threshold routing |
| 86 | + additional_metadata={"document_type": "balance_sheet"}, |
| 87 | + ) |
| 88 | + test_cases.append(balance_sheet_case) |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | + # --- Annual report (10-K narrative) query --- |
| 91 | + # Moderate precision: narrative paraphrase acceptable. |
| 92 | + annual_report_case = LLMTestCase( |
| 93 | + input="What drove revenue growth in FY2023 according to the 10-K?", |
| 94 | + actual_output=( |
| 95 | + "Revenue growth in FY2023 was primarily driven by the cloud segment, " |
| 96 | + "which grew 34% year-over-year and contributed $1.4B to the total " |
| 97 | + "revenue increase." |
| 98 | + ), |
| 99 | + expected_output=( |
| 100 | + "The cloud segment drove revenue growth, growing 34% YoY " |
| 101 | + "and contributing $1.4B to overall revenue gains." |
| 102 | + ), |
| 103 | + retrieval_context=[ |
| 104 | + "Revenue for FY2023 was $4.2 billion, up 12% year-over-year. " |
| 105 | + "The primary growth driver was the cloud segment, which grew 34% " |
| 106 | + "year-over-year and contributed $1.4 billion to the revenue increase. " |
| 107 | + "Enterprise software and services also grew 8%, while legacy hardware " |
| 108 | + "revenue declined 5%.", |
| 109 | + ], |
| 110 | + additional_metadata={"document_type": "annual_report"}, |
| 111 | + ) |
| 112 | + test_cases.append(annual_report_case) |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | + # --- Earnings call query --- |
| 115 | + # Lower threshold: forward-looking statements and hedged language. |
| 116 | + earnings_call_case = LLMTestCase( |
| 117 | + input="What guidance did management provide for FY2024 revenue?", |
| 118 | + actual_output=( |
| 119 | + "Management guided for FY2024 revenue in the range of $4.6B to $4.8B, " |
| 120 | + "representing 10-14% growth, subject to macroeconomic conditions." |
| 121 | + ), |
| 122 | + expected_output=( |
| 123 | + "FY2024 revenue guidance: $4.6B–4.8B (10–14% growth), " |
| 124 | + "conditional on macroeconomic environment." |
| 125 | + ), |
| 126 | + retrieval_context=[ |
| 127 | + "Looking ahead, we are guiding to fiscal 2024 revenue in the range of " |
| 128 | + "$4.6 to $4.8 billion, which represents growth of approximately 10 to 14 " |
| 129 | + "percent year-over-year. This outlook assumes stable macroeconomic " |
| 130 | + "conditions and does not account for potential FX headwinds beyond " |
| 131 | + "current rates. We feel confident in our pipeline but remain cautious " |
| 132 | + "given the broader environment.", |
| 133 | + ], |
| 134 | + additional_metadata={"document_type": "earnings_call"}, |
| 135 | + ) |
| 136 | + test_cases.append(earnings_call_case) |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | + return test_cases |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 142 | +# Metrics with threshold_overrides |
| 143 | +# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 144 | +# Note: threshold_overrides is available once PR #2785 is merged. |
| 145 | +# Until then, the metrics will use the default threshold. |
| 146 | +# The metadata["document_type"] key is used to select the override. |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +def build_metrics(): |
| 149 | + """Build metrics with document-type threshold overrides. |
| 150 | +
|
| 151 | + threshold_overrides: dict mapping document_type values to thresholds. |
| 152 | + The metric checks test_case.additional_metadata["document_type"] and |
| 153 | + applies the matching threshold, falling back to the default threshold |
| 154 | + if the key is absent or unrecognised. |
| 155 | + """ |
| 156 | + faithfulness = FaithfulnessMetric( |
| 157 | + threshold=THRESHOLD_OVERRIDES["default"], |
| 158 | + # threshold_overrides will route to the right threshold per test case |
| 159 | + # threshold_overrides=THRESHOLD_OVERRIDES, # Uncomment post-PR #2785 |
| 160 | + verbose_mode=True, |
| 161 | + ) |
| 162 | + precision = ContextualPrecisionMetric( |
| 163 | + threshold=THRESHOLD_OVERRIDES["default"], |
| 164 | + # threshold_overrides=THRESHOLD_OVERRIDES, # Uncomment post-PR #2785 |
| 165 | + verbose_mode=True, |
| 166 | + ) |
| 167 | + recall = ContextualRecallMetric( |
| 168 | + threshold=THRESHOLD_OVERRIDES["default"], |
| 169 | + # threshold_overrides=THRESHOLD_OVERRIDES, # Uncomment post-PR #2785 |
| 170 | + verbose_mode=True, |
| 171 | + ) |
| 172 | + return [faithfulness, precision, recall] |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 176 | +# Run evaluation |
| 177 | +# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +def run_heterogeneous_eval(): |
| 180 | + """Run the full heterogeneous document evaluation. |
| 181 | +
|
| 182 | + Results will show per-test-case scores. The key insight: |
| 183 | + - Balance sheet cases should be evaluated at 0.95 threshold. |
| 184 | + - Earnings call cases pass at 0.70 threshold even with hedged language. |
| 185 | + - Without threshold_overrides, all cases use the same threshold, |
| 186 | + leading to false failures on earnings calls or false passes on |
| 187 | + balance sheets. |
| 188 | + """ |
| 189 | + test_cases = build_test_cases() |
| 190 | + metrics = build_metrics() |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | + results = evaluate( |
| 193 | + test_cases=test_cases, |
| 194 | + metrics=metrics, |
| 195 | + # Optional: group results by document type for easier analysis |
| 196 | + # run_async=False, # Useful for debugging |
| 197 | + ) |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | + print("\n--- Evaluation Results ---") |
| 200 | + for result in results.test_results: |
| 201 | + doc_type = result.additional_metadata.get("document_type", "unknown") |
| 202 | + threshold_used = THRESHOLD_OVERRIDES.get( |
| 203 | + doc_type, THRESHOLD_OVERRIDES["default"] |
| 204 | + ) |
| 205 | + print(f"\nDocument type: {doc_type}") |
| 206 | + print(f"Expected threshold: {threshold_used}") |
| 207 | + for metric_result in result.metrics_data: |
| 208 | + status = "✅" if metric_result.success else "❌" |
| 209 | + print( |
| 210 | + f" {status} {metric_result.name}: " |
| 211 | + f"{metric_result.score:.3f} " |
| 212 | + f"(threshold: {metric_result.threshold})" |
| 213 | + ) |
| 214 | + |
| 215 | + return results |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | + |
| 218 | +if __name__ == "__main__": |
| 219 | + if not os.environ.get("OPENAI_API_KEY"): |
| 220 | + raise EnvironmentError( |
| 221 | + "OPENAI_API_KEY not set. Export your API key before running:\n" |
| 222 | + " export OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-..." |
| 223 | + ) |
| 224 | + run_heterogeneous_eval() |
0 commit comments