From e6e3c6c3fa4c10e28ba231c53dac30bf84c6f6d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Tomasz=20Kami=C5=84ski?= <tomaszkam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 21:32:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Updated comment on issue 4484

---
 xml/issue4484.xml | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xml/issue4484.xml b/xml/issue4484.xml
index 47f3f3c8a1..44a451b947 100644
--- a/xml/issue4484.xml
+++ b/xml/issue4484.xml
@@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ but per <sref ref="[temp.param]"/>/13, a template parameter object must be of a
 
 <note>2025-11-27; Tomasz comments</note>
 <p>
-This was on core side by LWG <iref ref="4437"/>. The usage of the term template parameter object is intended (uniqueness).
+The template argument object defintion was extended to cover objects of array types by CWG 3111.
+The usage of the term "template parameter object" is intentional here, as it guarantees that
+`reflect_constant_string` produces the same objects, where their content is the same.
 </p>
 </discussion>