Test for conformant RBAC management

[negz]

What problem are you facing?

Crossplane includes an RBAC manager that manages RBAC roles for both Crossplane controllers (e.g. to enable composition and providers to function) and users (e.g. to create roles like crossplane-admin). Deploying the RBAC manager is optional, but I'm not sure whether we should allow distributions of Crossplane to omit it completely.

How could conformance help solve your problem?

We should determine whether we should test for RBAC manager conformance, and what exactly we're testing for, then write the tests. Perhaps we could test for only Basic mode support (i.e. the permissions required for Crossplane controllers to function).

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.