Skip to content

Investigate why medusa saves more corpus items than echidna #553

Open
@anishnaik

Description

@anishnaik

According to internal benchmarking results, medusa saves many more corpus items than echidna does even though coverage between the two fuzzers is competitive/comparable. This would imply that we may be doing something wrong. Reducing corpus entries while maintaining coverage will reduce disk writes/reads and improve speed when re-reading the corpus.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    high-prioritynot-an-issueplanningThis issue is currently in a planning/discussion phase and should not be implemented yet.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions