Improve Claude Code prompting

[lucwollants]

Added

• Added basic docs regarding architecture, coding guidelines, and review guidelines to give AI tools a context to work in
• Added a CLAUDE.md file that points to the various detailed docs so it's easy to switch to another tool

Changed

• Move the review guidelines into a dedicated file

[lucwollants]

@claude review

[lucwollants]

@claude review

[claude]

Claude finished @lucwollants's task in 2m 8s —— View job

---

Review Complete

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
• Start pending review
• Fetch and analyze PR diff
• Review documentation files
• Add inline comments with suggestions
• Submit review
• Provide final summary

Summary

Reviewed the PR and provided inline feedback on 8 specific areas. The documentation structure is well-organized with clear separation between quick reference (CLAUDE.md) and detailed docs. The workflow simplification improves maintainability.

Key findings:

• SAPI3 setup documentation is missing (referenced in multiple docs but no setup instructions)
• AI restrictions in coding-guidelines.md conflict with Claude GitHub Action behavior
• Workflow now only triggers on issue comments (manual-only mode)
• Several opportunities for minor enhancements around failure scenarios, logging guidance, and codebase-specific review checks

All feedback has been posted as inline review comments with actionable suggestions where applicable.

---

[grubolsch]

wow, this is amazing work.
Also kinda funny we add documentation now for machines.

[lucwollants]

wow, this is amazing work. Also kinda funny we add documentation now for machines.

We can also still use it, but maybe this becomes less relevant because we will write less and less code and focus more on providing added value for our customers.