Embedded color profiles are detected, but not tagged color profiles

[daoxi]

Windows OS version

Windows 10 22H2

ImageGlass version

9.3.2.520 (64-bit)

ImageGlass release

Classic

1️⃣ Steps to reproduce

In Jeffrey Friedl's Blog there's a post explaining how color profiles are included in images: either "embedded" or "tagged"

Download the test images under the "Tagged" section, for example, Momiji-sRGB-tagged.jpg and Momiji-AdobeRGB-tagged.jpg, then view these images in ImageGlass.

2️⃣ Actual behavior

Apparently the images have different colors when viewed in ImageGlass, the color of "Momiji-AdobeRGB-tagged.jpg" is noticeably duller than "Momiji-sRGB-tagged.jpg", likely because the tagged color profile wasn't detected. (and yes, it's normal if the colors are also different when viewed in browsers, because browsers typically can't detect tagged color profiles either, but dedicated image software often can)

3️⃣ Expected behavior

Those images should have pretty much the same color tone (if you check those images in a dedicated image software such as Photoshop or ACDSee Pro, they should have the same color tone, as expected).

4️⃣ Screenshots / Video / Sample image file

5️⃣ Additional context

When a color profile is "tagged" instead of "embedded", it means the color profile is just defined in the image's metadata. This is usually done for color profiles that are already relatively common (e.g. AdobeRGB, AppleRGB, etc.).

ImageGlass does detect embedded ones as expected, but not tagged ones (which I'm assuming isn't intentional as I didn't find an existing Github issue about this), perhaps it's a good idea to still be able to detect the common color profiles when they're tagged instead of embedded?