Skip to content

Remove traceback from sizeof failure warning#9006

Merged
fjetter merged 2 commits intodask:mainfrom
jacobtomlinson:quiet-sizeof-default
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

Remove traceback from sizeof failure warning#9006
fjetter merged 2 commits intodask:mainfrom
jacobtomlinson:quiet-sizeof-default

Conversation

@jacobtomlinson
Copy link
Member

Closes #8566

Logging the traceback from a sizeof failure seems like it doesn't add much value to users. It might be helpful when debugging why it's happening.

This PR removes the traceback from the warning but adds a debug log which includes the traceback. This allows folks to see it when they want to by setting the appropriate log level.

  • Tests added / passed
  • Passes pre-commit run --all-files

@jacobtomlinson jacobtomlinson changed the title Remove traceback from sizeof failure Remove traceback from sizeof failure warning Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results

See test report for an extended history of previous test failures. This is useful for diagnosing flaky tests.

    27 files  ±0      27 suites  ±0   11h 47m 22s ⏱️ + 13m 15s
 4 120 tests ±0   4 000 ✅  - 9    111 💤 ±0  8 ❌ +8  1 🔥 +1 
51 668 runs  +1  49 362 ✅  - 8  2 297 💤 ±0  8 ❌ +8  1 🔥 +1 

For more details on these failures and errors, see this check.

Results for commit 8b5874e. ± Comparison against base commit 55bb639.

Copy link
Member

@fjetter fjetter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I assume you ran into this yourself? sizeof warnings are not critical but if the estimation is wrong this can cause uncomfortable scheduling artifacts so I recommend looking into it. I agree that we don't need to spam the logs because of this.

@fjetter fjetter merged commit 06be061 into dask:main Feb 13, 2025
27 of 34 checks passed
@jacobtomlinson jacobtomlinson deleted the quiet-sizeof-default branch February 14, 2025 11:09
@jacobtomlinson
Copy link
Member Author

jacobtomlinson commented Feb 14, 2025

No I didn't run into this. I was just triaging issues and this one seemed like a quick fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sizeof traceback is very long

2 participants