Skip to content

Lists are not comprehensive #4

Open
@mathiasbynens

Description

@mathiasbynens

The project’s README promises comprehensive feature lists. Either the word “comprehensive” should be removed, or the missing features should be added.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions