📝 Update resources section

Author: davidgasquez

Impact Evaluators.md

@@ -161,12 +161,9 @@ It's hard to do [[Public Goods Funding]], open-source software, research, etc. t
 - [Impact Evaluator Design](https://youtu.be/1soPQ31ZHkQ)
 - [Impact Evaluators](https://youtu.be/dpLtrugjfMc)
 - [Generalized Impact Evaluators, A year of experiments and theory](https://research.protocol.ai/blog/2023/generalized-impact-evaluators-a-year-of-experiments-and-theory/)
-- [Elo vs Bradley-Terry Model](https://www.keiruaprod.fr/blog/2021/06/02/elo-vs-bradley-terry-model.html)
-- [Designing a Better Judging System](https://anishathalye.com/designing-a-better-judging-system/)
 - [Deliberative Consensus Protocols](https://jonathanwarden.com/deliberative-consensus-protocols/)
 - [Credible Neutrality](https://balajis.com/p/credible-neutrality)
 - [Quadratic Payments: A Primer](https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2019/12/07/quadratic.html)
-- [Quadratic vs Pairwise](https://blog.zaratan.world/p/quadratic-v-pairwise)
 - [Quadratic Funding is Not Optimal](https://jonathanwarden.com/quadratic-funding-is-not-optimal/)
 - [A Mild Critique of Quadratic Funding](https://kronosapiens.github.io/blog/2019/12/13/mild-critique-qf.html)
 - [Funding impact via milestone markets](https://docs.fileverse.io/0x0D97273dee4D1010321f9eBa2e9eaB135C17D6dE/0#key=5GgcacTDy2h1QwWV9vJqGD-YzwomzuIOueMACpjghbJLxfG3ZqbWl1qDC1Le04uR)
@@ -200,7 +197,6 @@ It's hard to do [[Public Goods Funding]], open-source software, research, etc. t
 - [Ostrom's Common Pool Resource Management](https://earthbound.report/2018/01/15/elinor-ostroms-8-rules-for-managing-the-commons/)
 - [Community Notes Note ranking algorithm](https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes)
 - [Deep Funding is a Special Case of Generalized Impact Evaluators](https://hackmd.io/@dwddao/HypnqpQKke)
-- [An Analysis of Pairwise Preference](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3359677)
 - [Analysing public goods games using reinforcement learning: effect of increasing group size on cooperation](https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.241195)
 - [CrowdTruth 2.0: Quality Metrics for Crowdsourcing with Disagreement](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.06080)
 - [Coevolutionary dynamics of population and institutional rewards in public goods games](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095741742302081X)

Pairwise Comparisons.md

@@ -24,3 +24,10 @@ Pairwise comparisons are any processes of comparing entities in pairs to judge w
 - Use robust methods (crowd BT, hierarchical BT, [Bayesian variants](https://erichorvitz.com/crowd_pairwise.pdf)) to correct annotator bias and uncertainty.
 - Expert jurors can be inconsistent, biased, and expensive. [Large graphs of comparisons](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.01462) are needed to tame variance.
 - You can report accuracy/Brier by using [bootstrap](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootstrapping_(statistics)).
+
+## Resources
+
+- [Elo vs Bradley-Terry Model](https://www.keiruaprod.fr/blog/2021/06/02/elo-vs-bradley-terry-model.html)
+- [Designing a Better Judging System](https://anishathalye.com/designing-a-better-judging-system/)
+- [Quadratic vs Pairwise](https://blog.zaratan.world/p/quadratic-v-pairwise)
+- [An Analysis of Pairwise Preference](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3359677)