Skip to content

research: fold open PR branches into the honest-scholar hypothesis workflow #137

Description

@davorrunje

Context

mononet was onboarded onto the honest-scholar workflow in #136 (research-init adopt), which established docs/research/ with four papers and retroactive hypotheses. Several in-flight feature branches / draft PRs predate the onboarding and are not yet expressed as honest-scholar hypotheses, so their work does not enter through the hypothesis-testing front door and their results are not wired as findings.md evidence.

Design context: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-21-honest-scholar-integration-design.md (§6, deferred) and .honest-scholar/config.yml.

Goal

Map each open feature PR/branch to a hypothesis under the correct paper in docs/research/, so in-flight engineering resumes through the honest-scholar hypothesis-testing flow and its committed results attach as evidence.

Where

Proposed approach

For each open PR/branch: identify the hypothesis it advances (create the folder from templates if none), set findings.md evidence: to the result JSONs the branch commits, and once the analysis completes, obtain the author's named sign-off on the verdict. PR #115 (large-dataset screen: "monotone depth is neutral across all 5 datasets") is the natural evidence for deep-monotonic-residual-accuracy.

Acceptance criteria

  • Every currently-open feature PR/branch is either mapped to a hypothesis folder or explicitly closed/won't-do.
  • The four unsigned hypotheses above have their evidence: wired to committed run-refs (or remain honestly pending with a blocker noting why).
  • docs/research/dashboard.md regenerated to reflect the new mappings.

References

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    follow-upDeferred work captured as a self-contained issue

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions