You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
mononet was onboarded onto the honest-scholar workflow in #136 (research-init adopt), which established docs/research/ with four papers and retroactive hypotheses. Several in-flight feature branches / draft PRs predate the onboarding and are not yet expressed as honest-scholar hypotheses, so their work does not enter through the hypothesis-testing front door and their results are not wired as findings.md evidence.
Design context: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-21-honest-scholar-integration-design.md (§6, deferred) and .honest-scholar/config.yml.
Goal
Map each open feature PR/branch to a hypothesis under the correct paper in docs/research/, so in-flight engineering resumes through the honest-scholar hypothesis-testing flow and its committed results attach as evidence.
For each open PR/branch: identify the hypothesis it advances (create the folder from templates if none), set findings.mdevidence: to the result JSONs the branch commits, and once the analysis completes, obtain the author's named sign-off on the verdict. PR #115 (large-dataset screen: "monotone depth is neutral across all 5 datasets") is the natural evidence for deep-monotonic-residual-accuracy.
Acceptance criteria
Every currently-open feature PR/branch is either mapped to a hypothesis folder or explicitly closed/won't-do.
The four unsigned hypotheses above have their evidence: wired to committed run-refs (or remain honestly pending with a blocker noting why).
docs/research/dashboard.md regenerated to reflect the new mappings.
Context
mononet was onboarded onto the honest-scholar workflow in #136 (
research-init adopt), which establisheddocs/research/with four papers and retroactive hypotheses. Several in-flight feature branches / draft PRs predate the onboarding and are not yet expressed as honest-scholar hypotheses, so their work does not enter through thehypothesis-testingfront door and their results are not wired asfindings.mdevidence.Design context:
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-21-honest-scholar-integration-design.md(§6, deferred) and.honest-scholar/config.yml.Goal
Map each open feature PR/branch to a hypothesis under the correct paper in
docs/research/, so in-flight engineering resumes through the honest-scholarhypothesis-testingflow and its committed results attach as evidence.Where
docs/research/monotone-constructions/,docs/research/structure-preserving-pinns/.docs/research/monotone-constructions/hypotheses/2026-07-21-alternate-construction-base/(open draft PR)docs/research/monotone-constructions/hypotheses/2026-07-21-deep-monotonic-residual-accuracy/→ PR feat(benchmarks): deep monotonic residual accuracy flavor (Stage 2 plumbing) #114 (feat/deep-residual-accuracy)docs/research/monotone-constructions/hypotheses/2026-07-21-hp-search-sensitivity/(not done)docs/research/monotone-constructions/hypotheses/2026-07-21-flavor-convex-fraction-ablation/(not done)docs/monotone-constructions-handoff), Applications: Structure-Preserving PINNs (Paper 1) — framework + inverse/traffic headline #116 (spec/applications-structure-preserving-pinns), bench(results): large-dataset screen — monotone depth is neutral across all 5 datasets #115 (feat/screen-results-clean), feat(benchmarks): deep monotonic residual accuracy flavor (Stage 2 plumbing) #114 (feat/deep-residual-accuracy), bench: larger synthetic n_train + L=4 Stage-2 recast #113 (chore/synth-larger-for-large-batch-band); branchesfeat/alternate-construction,feat/alternate-base-result,feat/phase4-flavor-ablation,feat/stage2-unified-depth-benchmark,feat/monotone-depth-probe.Proposed approach
For each open PR/branch: identify the hypothesis it advances (create the folder from templates if none), set
findings.mdevidence:to the result JSONs the branch commits, and once the analysis completes, obtain the author's named sign-off on the verdict. PR #115 (large-dataset screen: "monotone depth is neutral across all 5 datasets") is the natural evidence fordeep-monotonic-residual-accuracy.Acceptance criteria
evidence:wired to committed run-refs (or remain honestlypendingwith a blocker noting why).docs/research/dashboard.mdregenerated to reflect the new mappings.References
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-21-honest-scholar-integration-design.md