test(databricks): cover catalog metadata text parity - #15710
Open
sd-db wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the contributing guide. |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the contributing guide. |
sd-db
force-pushed
the
sd-db/port/catalog-metadata-text-fusion
branch
from
July 29, 2026 06:47
970f105 to
6f09cf1
Compare
Author
|
This PR adds test-only parity coverage and does not change user-facing behavior or interfaces. Could a maintainer please apply the |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #15691
Problem
databricks/dbt-databricks#1428 prevents catalog generation from failing when
metadata from separate schemas receives conflicting agate-inferred types. The
Fusion adapter already represents these fields with Arrow string arrays and
typed Rust strings, but it did not have focused regression coverage for the
same boundary cases.
Solution
Add Databricks metadata adapter tests that verify:
value-driven type conflict;
No production behavior changes are required because Fusion is already
conformant with the dbt-databricks behavior.
Testing
cargo test -p dbt-adapter catalog_metadata_ --libChecklist