Skip to content

Feature - human-readable version of write_settings method #1218

@maxkadel

Description

@maxkadel

I work for a university library, and I'm exploring using dedupe for identifying partner MARC records that are duplicates of our existing records.

I've had some success, using dedupe in combination with the pymarc library.

My issue is that I don't think I can get buy-in to use this work in production without more transparency about what decisions the machine learning algorithm has made about the training data - basically, I want some version of the write_settings method that writes those settings in a more human-readable way, even if that human has to have some expertise in order to interpret those settings.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions