Wrong result and low efficiency of integrated test 108_PW_RE_NEW with SG15 pseudopotential

[kirk0830]

Describe the bug

test report here: https://labs.dp.tech/projects/abacustest/?request=GET%3A%2Fapplications%2Fabacustest%2Fjobs%2Fjob-abacustest-v0.3.40-e290cc
When I was trying to validate change of refactored codes, I find this bug.
Three kinds of pseudopotentials are used:
dojo: scalar relativistic, norm-conserving, from pseudojo, version 0.5
oncv: SG15, provided in tests/PP_ORB
pd04: original set pseudopotential

Expected behavior

No response

To Reproduce

No response

Environment

No response

Additional Context

No response

Task list for Issue attackers

• Verify the issue is not a duplicate.
• Describe the bug.
• Steps to reproduce.
• Expected behavior.
• Error message.
• Environment details.
• Additional context.
• Assign a priority level (low, medium, high, urgent).
• Assign the issue to a team member.
• Label the issue with relevant tags.
• Identify possible related issues.
• Create a unit test or automated test to reproduce the bug (if applicable).
• Fix the bug.
• Test the fix.
• Update documentation (if necessary).
• Close the issue and inform the reporter (if applicable).

[kirk0830]

I have tested qe with similar parameters, find SG15 pseudopotential also yields crazy results and confusing performance:
oncv.log
pd04.log
dojo.log
May be better inform other users of avoiding using SG15 pseudopotential for at least Al