-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 118
test: Tombstone expiration e2e test for log compaction #1341
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1341 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.80% 84.80%
=======================================
Files 113 113
Lines 28642 28642
Branches 28642 28642
=======================================
Hits 24289 24289
Misses 3196 3196
Partials 1157 1157 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
| batch.into_parts().0, | ||
| )) | ||
| }); | ||
| let compaction_data_iter = compacted_data_batches.into_iter().map(Ok); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed this bug in the test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! fairly verbose (no fault here, just noticing room for improvement in general), perhaps we get this in but open a follow up to improve this + general test infra? Would love to start collecting examples and see how we can begin to improve
Co-authored-by: OussamaSaoudi <[email protected]>
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Add a new end to end test for tombstone expiration in log compaction writer we introduced in
#1234
Fixes: #1288