You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#[derive(Debug,Clone,Serialize,Deserialize,Default)]pubstructStats{/// Total number of physical records in the file.#[serde(rename = "numRecords")]pubnum_records:i64,/// Whether per-column min/max bounds are tight.#[serde(rename = "tightBounds", skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]pubtight_bounds:Option<bool>,/// Minimum values per column (may be nested).#[serde(rename = "minValues", skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]pubmin_values:Option<HashMap<String, serde_json::Value>>,/// Maximum values per column (may be nested).#[serde(rename = "maxValues", skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]pubmax_values:Option<HashMap<String, serde_json::Value>>,/// Null counts per column.#[serde(rename = "nullCount", skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]pubnull_count:Option<HashMap<String,i64>>,}
For these maps, it's mapped from column name, which means when when we perform a schema evolution, like renaming a column, deleting and re-creating the same column, it's hard to tell.
I'm wondering why don't we use field-id as iceberg?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
From https://github.com/delta-io/delta/blob/master/PROTOCOL.md#Per-file-Statistics, the per-file stats looks like
For these maps, it's mapped from column name, which means when when we perform a schema evolution, like renaming a column, deleting and re-creating the same column, it's hard to tell.
I'm wondering why don't we use field-id as iceberg?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions