Skip to content

UI Suggestion: merge all parliament views, use filters instead #1605

Open
@justcomplaining

Description

End-user suggestion:

Especially if Democracy is moving into a multi-level direction with local, state, federal and European level all part of the app, the per-parliament-per-legislature approach will quickly become hard to navigate. I would instead suggest migrating into a feature first, data source second approach, where there's only one list of e.g. laws/motions, candidates/members of parliament or agreement/wahl-o-meter with well-structured and flexible filtering options.

This would make it possible to e.g. get a value of agreement with a political party or person across all levels and time frames as well as general agreement with parliaments on all or specific levels or such interesting things as general agreement with female/male politicians etc.

For laws/motions, a user could get e.g. a list of all current motions across all levels relevant for them (e.g. both a federal law and a local motion on their city's program on support for theatres etc.)

I suspect it won't be easy to implement as data structure might vary across levels and legislatures. If it's somehow possible to do it, it would be highly beneficial.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions