[Campaign Landing Page] Some sections are missing the' required asterisk' that denotes a required field

[FranECross]

Description

In ticket #19163 , this issue was resolved specifically for the Spotlight field, but it was discovered during implementation testing that other sections are also missing the 'required field' red asterisk, causing a confusing editor experience when they are creating/editing/saving Campaign Landing Pages.

The following sections are missing this attribute:

• Video
• What you can do - Promos
• Page-specific or Reusable Q&As

Additional Details

• Video section: The Add Media button should have the red asterisk. UX Question: Since a minimum of 2 are required, should there be help text under the button, or displayed after the button is clicked?
  

• What you can do Promos
  

• Page-specific or Reusable Q&As
  

User story

Describe the audience/user, enhancement or fix, and value / outcome desired.

AS A
I WANT
SO THAT

Engineering notes / background

Analytics considerations

Testing & QA

Scope / Impact analysis

What, if anything, could break as a result of this change?
Engineer should assess this when approaching PR.

Roles / assignments

After functional testing, code review, accessibility review, and design review can happen in parallel.

• Functional testing:
• Code review:
• Design review:
• Accessibility review:
• Product acceptance:

Acceptance criteria

ACs should capture expected behavior, to inform test plans. Consider devices, documentation updates including KBs, change management, and content model when applicable.

• [ ]
• Impact analysis is filled out and QA test plan is updated accordingly
• Does this product have an existing regression test plan?
  • Yes, link:
  • No, regression test plan will be created as part of the work / points in this ticket

[jilladams]

There are a couple UX questions nested in here before we could assign it to a Drupal engineer. When we refine, we can sort out if Dave or Jordan can give insights for help text etc on the fly or would prefer a separate ticket?

[jilladams]

(In the spirit of letting Product own the To Refine column / Refinement agenda, I didn't bump this ticket to that column.)

[FranECross]

Sounds good; I'm actually still grooming/updating the ticket, so will move it over soonish when I finish up. :)