Overview
Define the initial architecture so UI, business logic, Windows API access, persistence, diagnostics, and future plugins evolve in a modular and testable way.
Objectives
- Establish the foundational application architecture capability for SystemPulse.
- Keep the implementation modular, testable, and suitable for future milestones.
- Document conventions so contributors can extend the area consistently.
Scope
Included:
- Core implementation patterns and repository artifacts for this foundation task.
- Documentation required for future contributors to use or extend the work.
- Tests or validation hooks appropriate for the implemented surface.
Out of scope:
- Product features assigned to later milestones.
- Final UX polish beyond foundation readiness.
- Cloud services, telemetry upload, or release packaging unless explicitly required.
Functional Requirements
- Define SystemPulse.App as presentation and composition root.
- Define SystemPulse.Core as UI-independent domain and service logic.
- Define SystemPulse.Platform as Windows API boundary and adapter layer.
- Document dependency direction rules between modules.
- Create a lightweight service initialization pattern for app startup.
- Define error propagation conventions between platform and UI layers.
- Define async guidance for long-running Windows API calls.
- Establish naming conventions for services, adapters, models, and view models.
- Add starter interfaces for logging, configuration, and platform diagnostics as needed.
- Document testing strategy by module boundary.
- Record architecture decisions in docs/architecture.
- Define how future SQLite and plugin components fit without direct UI coupling.
Technical Considerations
- Keep WinUI 3 concerns separated from C++ core services unless the issue is explicitly UI-focused.
- Prefer explicit interfaces, narrow responsibilities, and dependency direction that matches the architecture plan.
- Use Windows API boundaries carefully so platform behavior can be tested or mocked.
- Integrate with logging, configuration, CMake, and CI where relevant.
- Avoid introducing global mutable state or feature-specific shortcuts that future milestones must undo.
Dependency Policy
- Prefer scratch implementations over third-party libraries whenever practical.
- Do not introduce Python or pip dependencies.
- Do not introduce unnecessary external runtime dependencies.
- Prefer the C++ Standard Library, Windows SDK, Win32 APIs, and WinUI 3.
- Any proposed external dependency must include a written technical justification explaining why an in-house implementation is not practical.
- Keep all components modular so future internal replacements remain straightforward.
Deliverables
- Source files, configuration files, or documentation implementing this foundation area.
- Tests, examples, or validation scripts where applicable.
- README or docs updates explaining usage and extension points.
- Integration with existing build and repository conventions.
Acceptance Criteria
Dependencies
- M1.1 - Initialize Repository Structure
Suggested Labels
- enhancement
- foundation
- architecture
- core
Overview
Define the initial architecture so UI, business logic, Windows API access, persistence, diagnostics, and future plugins evolve in a modular and testable way.
Objectives
Scope
Included:
Out of scope:
Functional Requirements
Technical Considerations
Dependency Policy
Deliverables
Acceptance Criteria
Architecture documentation explains every top-level runtime module.
Dependency direction is explicit and reviewable.
Future feature areas have clear target modules.
UI layer does not own Windows API implementation details.
Platform layer can be tested or mocked from core-facing interfaces.
Documentation includes error handling and async guidance.
The design supports future SQLite and plugin integration.
No unnecessary framework dependency is introduced without documented rationale.
No Python or pip dependency introduced.
No unnecessary third-party runtime dependency introduced.
Solution primarily relies on C++ Standard Library and Windows APIs.
Any external dependency is fully documented and technically justified.
Dependencies
Suggested Labels