[feature] be able to give an order to execute the group

[dev-a]

Hello
I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature, but yesterday I got an unexpected result.

Let's imagine that I decided to create three groups/tags:
title, heading, and content.
Each has a filter: title, h1, .content.

The ‘title’ group was assigned the ID
c585afff-5ef8-4abb-ad40-42fd9d3d9058.
The ‘h1’ group was assigned the ID
adf285f5-3de2-4dd7-a212-4478331ac388
The ‘content’ group was assigned the ID
4be004ec-3b86-48e0-a26b-e60244d6f6f3

I added the following tags to my “watch” in this order:
title, heading, content

However, clearly
at the time of notification
it will first give me
‘content’
then ‘heading’
and finally ‘title’

which is not logical in this case XD

I understand the problem: it must sort according to the ID to determine the order rather than using the order of the tags on the watch.

A little bonus:
I've deleted a group by mistake quite a few times while testing this thing. There should be a “Are you sure you want to delete?” prompt when the group isn't empty.

PS: Congratulations on the latest release, it seems to have a lot of interesting features.

[dgtlmoon]

heya
you mean like here, if there was a RECHECK button on each row? (plus API endpoint update)

[dgtlmoon]

I've deleted a group by mistake quite a few times while testing this thing. There should be a “Are you sure you want to delete?” prompt when the group isn't empty.

you are not using the latest version then, please update :-)

[dev-a]

No, I think there's been a misunderstanding.
I admit that I had trouble reproducing my problem.
Look.
we will monitor https://perdu.com/
I can filter like this

but I can also do that

Of course it's really strange to do that.

But in the watch edition, I can do that and organize it as I want.

However, if I move my 3 lines into 3 different groups

The result may be random.

I don't quite understand the order in which the three rules are executed.
It's not the order in which we put the tags in the watch.

I think it's the order in which the tag was created (and therefore the order in which it was declared in the j file) and not the ID, as I wrote in my first message.

↑ In the new version, tags are not displayed as they are typed.

I think it would be good to be able to choose the order in the same way as you can do in Watch Edition.

[dgtlmoon]

You mean "tag" as in the HTML element right?