Description
CBMC version: f9bd83e
CBMC seems to be struggling to prove unbounded correctness under large allocations. Here is a super simplified version of a proof that I and @akshayutture are working on:
struct elem { char c[ESIZE]; };
int main() {
struct elem *a = malloc(ASIZE * sizeof(struct elem));
for(unsigned i = 0; i < ASIZE; ++i)
__CPROVER_assigns(i, __CPROVER_POINTER_OBJECT(a))
__CPROVER_loop_invariant(1 == 1)
{
a[i].c[0] = 0;
}
}
The loop isn’t doing anything interesting and the invariant is trivial. The only “expensive” operations here are the initial malloc
and the subsequent havoc
(for the assigns clause).
We verify this example using:
$ goto-cc -o test.1.o -DESIZE=100 -DASIZE=1000 test.c
$ goto-instrument --apply-loop-contracts test.1.o test.2.o
$ cbmc test.2.o
Here are the proof times we observe:
Elem Size | Array Size | Proof time
-----------+------------+------------
100 | 1000 | 0.5 s
500 | 1000 | 2 s
1000 | 500 | 2 s
1000 | 1000 | 5 s
500 | 10000 | 24 s
@tautschnig figured out that this is because CBMC is not using array theory in this case and it bit blasts the large array which leads to the performance degradation.
He suggested the following workaround for initializing the a
array:
unsigned long asize;
struct elem *a = malloc(asize * sizeof(struct elem));
__CPROVER_assume(asize == ASIZE);
and indeed it fixes the performance issue that we notice above.
I am leaving this issue open so we fix this issue within CBMC at some point in the future.